<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: benmarcus.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/</link>
	<description>the internet literature magazine blog of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-52981</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-52981</guid>
		<description>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. 

Very excited about the new Marcus -- there&#039;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#039;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#039;s a hero, can&#039;t wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. </p>
<p>Very excited about the new Marcus &#8212; there&#8217;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#8217;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#8217;s a hero, can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-137941</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-137941</guid>
		<description>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. 

Very excited about the new Marcus -- there&#039;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#039;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#039;s a hero, can&#039;t wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. </p>
<p>Very excited about the new Marcus &#8212; there&#8217;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#8217;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#8217;s a hero, can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-137942</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-137942</guid>
		<description>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. 

Very excited about the new Marcus -- there&#039;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#039;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#039;s a hero, can&#039;t wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. </p>
<p>Very excited about the new Marcus &#8212; there&#8217;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#8217;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#8217;s a hero, can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-137943</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-137943</guid>
		<description>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. 

Very excited about the new Marcus -- there&#039;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#039;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#039;s a hero, can&#039;t wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Blake, thanks for reading, guys. </p>
<p>Very excited about the new Marcus &#8212; there&#8217;s this built-in extra drama for a writer like him, who does that Beckett think of writing within a very specific universe that slowly mutates book to book.  Judging from The Moors and a reading I saw him do for Harper&#8217;s a while back, looks like he will move another step on the Age of W&amp;S to Notable A W trajectory of making use an increasingly consolidated narrative, while using that central stability to do increasingly weird stuff on the margins, and raise increasingly complex ontological, epistemological and linguistic questions. Dude&#8217;s a hero, can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ramick</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-52973</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ramick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-52973</guid>
		<description>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ramick</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-137938</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ramick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-137938</guid>
		<description>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ramick</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-137939</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ramick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-137939</guid>
		<description>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ramick</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-137940</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ramick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-137940</guid>
		<description>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. We could all try a little harder (without making my common mistake of trying way too hard and expanding my comments into treatises—sorry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-52970</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-52970</guid>
		<description>shit. i didn&#039;t realize that story was published, lee. i remember it/that workshop session got blogged about somewhere back then, as someone writing about marcus&#039; visit to iowa (no?), and i was super curious to read it. off to do so now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shit. i didn&#8217;t realize that story was published, lee. i remember it/that workshop session got blogged about somewhere back then, as someone writing about marcus&#8217; visit to iowa (no?), and i was super curious to read it. off to do so now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/benmarcus-com/comment-page-1/#comment-137935</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25826#comment-137935</guid>
		<description>shit. i didn&#039;t realize that story was published, lee. i remember it/that workshop session got blogged about somewhere back then, as someone writing about marcus&#039; visit to iowa (no?), and i was super curious to read it. off to do so now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shit. i didn&#8217;t realize that story was published, lee. i remember it/that workshop session got blogged about somewhere back then, as someone writing about marcus&#8217; visit to iowa (no?), and i was super curious to read it. off to do so now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

