<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/</link>
	<description>the internet literature magazine blog of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links: If You Really Want to Hear About It &#171; Mark Athitakis&#8217; American Fiction Notes</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-52260</link>
		<dc:creator>Links: If You Really Want to Hear About It &#171; Mark Athitakis&#8217; American Fiction Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-52260</guid>
		<description>[...] at least one Indian interviewer figures the country can learn from Raymond Carver. (via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least one Indian interviewer figures the country can learn from Raymond Carver. (via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-51923</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-51923</guid>
		<description>sure charles since you asked.

did i say reading franzen was more important than joyce?

no i did not.

the quote specifically states &quot;writers&quot;.  not writing.

in terms of reading the writing?  yeah.  of course go read all the dead authors.

duh.

personally, i think there is more value in obsessing over a living genius than a dead one.

if you are going to obsess.

you disagree.

great.

mexican breakdance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure charles since you asked.</p>
<p>did i say reading franzen was more important than joyce?</p>
<p>no i did not.</p>
<p>the quote specifically states &#8220;writers&#8221;.  not writing.</p>
<p>in terms of reading the writing?  yeah.  of course go read all the dead authors.</p>
<p>duh.</p>
<p>personally, i think there is more value in obsessing over a living genius than a dead one.</p>
<p>if you are going to obsess.</p>
<p>you disagree.</p>
<p>great.</p>
<p>mexican breakdance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-136733</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-136733</guid>
		<description>sure charles since you asked.

did i say reading franzen was more important than joyce?

no i did not.

the quote specifically states &quot;writers&quot;.  not writing.

in terms of reading the writing?  yeah.  of course go read all the dead authors.

duh.

personally, i think there is more value in obsessing over a living genius than a dead one.

if you are going to obsess.

you disagree.

great.

mexican breakdance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure charles since you asked.</p>
<p>did i say reading franzen was more important than joyce?</p>
<p>no i did not.</p>
<p>the quote specifically states &#8220;writers&#8221;.  not writing.</p>
<p>in terms of reading the writing?  yeah.  of course go read all the dead authors.</p>
<p>duh.</p>
<p>personally, i think there is more value in obsessing over a living genius than a dead one.</p>
<p>if you are going to obsess.</p>
<p>you disagree.</p>
<p>great.</p>
<p>mexican breakdance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Dodd White</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-51775</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Dodd White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-51775</guid>
		<description>perhaps the worst metaphor for art I&#039;ve ever read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps the worst metaphor for art I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Dodd White</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-136732</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Dodd White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-136732</guid>
		<description>perhaps the worst metaphor for art I&#039;ve ever read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps the worst metaphor for art I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Dodd White</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-51773</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Dodd White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-51773</guid>
		<description>Please explain to me why reading Franzen is more important than Joyce or McCarthy more important than Faulkner. I don&#039;t understand this line of reasoning at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please explain to me why reading Franzen is more important than Joyce or McCarthy more important than Faulkner. I don&#8217;t understand this line of reasoning at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Dodd White</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-136731</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Dodd White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-136731</guid>
		<description>Please explain to me why reading Franzen is more important than Joyce or McCarthy more important than Faulkner. I don&#039;t understand this line of reasoning at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please explain to me why reading Franzen is more important than Joyce or McCarthy more important than Faulkner. I don&#8217;t understand this line of reasoning at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-51712</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-51712</guid>
		<description>Also, it&#039;s kind of stupid to write anything about Carver without mentioning Lish.  I realize &quot;the conversation&quot; about them working together is dead until Lish decides to talk (which he never will), but to want to hear about Carver&#039;s writing without also hearing about Lish is like wanting to discuss Morrissey without mentioning Johnny Marr.  You are welcome for that terrible analogy!   I try my worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, it&#8217;s kind of stupid to write anything about Carver without mentioning Lish.  I realize &#8220;the conversation&#8221; about them working together is dead until Lish decides to talk (which he never will), but to want to hear about Carver&#8217;s writing without also hearing about Lish is like wanting to discuss Morrissey without mentioning Johnny Marr.  You are welcome for that terrible analogy!   I try my worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-136730</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-136730</guid>
		<description>Also, it&#039;s kind of stupid to write anything about Carver without mentioning Lish.  I realize &quot;the conversation&quot; about them working together is dead until Lish decides to talk (which he never will), but to want to hear about Carver&#039;s writing without also hearing about Lish is like wanting to discuss Morrissey without mentioning Johnny Marr.  You are welcome for that terrible analogy!   I try my worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, it&#8217;s kind of stupid to write anything about Carver without mentioning Lish.  I realize &#8220;the conversation&#8221; about them working together is dead until Lish decides to talk (which he never will), but to want to hear about Carver&#8217;s writing without also hearing about Lish is like wanting to discuss Morrissey without mentioning Johnny Marr.  You are welcome for that terrible analogy!   I try my worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/carve/comment-page-1/#comment-51705</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=25017#comment-51705</guid>
		<description>How about a Brangelina type thing for Lish and Carver?

Raydon?

Carvish?

Larver?

Gorday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a Brangelina type thing for Lish and Carver?</p>
<p>Raydon?</p>
<p>Carvish?</p>
<p>Larver?</p>
<p>Gorday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

