<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Joyce does not exist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/</link>
	<description>the internet literature magazine blog of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The best HTMLGIANT posts as chosen by you the readers of HTMLGIANT or at least some of you &#124; HTMLGIANT</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-230730</link>
		<dc:creator>The best HTMLGIANT posts as chosen by you the readers of HTMLGIANT or at least some of you &#124; HTMLGIANT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-230730</guid>
		<description>[...] Blake Butler: James Joyce does not exist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blake Butler: James Joyce does not exist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChicaBloom</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-196978</link>
		<dc:creator>ChicaBloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-196978</guid>
		<description>I propose a solution to this dilemma: Learn Spanish. South American writers and publishers are still taking risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose a solution to this dilemma: Learn Spanish. South American writers and publishers are still taking risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridge Dawson</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-194440</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridge Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-194440</guid>
		<description>To my mind a funny thought: Yes, it took balls to publish Joyce, And those balls were Sylvia Beach&#039;s.  She lost a good deal of money doing so (money she could ill afford to) in a very limited subscription printing, only later did random house and others make an investment in Ulysses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my mind a funny thought: Yes, it took balls to publish Joyce, And those balls were Sylvia Beach&#8217;s.  She lost a good deal of money doing so (money she could ill afford to) in a very limited subscription printing, only later did random house and others make an investment in Ulysses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Rogers</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-190117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-190117</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can’t think of most any publisher, even the major and innovative independents, that would release Ulysses again right now, if instead of an accepted masterpiece, it were a third book by some Irish guy who had published a collection of short fiction and a weird novella.&quot;

You make it sound like the publication of Ulysses was a walk in the park. It wasn&#039;t. Nobody wanted to publish Ulysses back in 1922 either. It was turned down by every publisher he approached, and in the end Joyce resorted to Sylvia Beach, an American woman who owned a bookshop in Paris called Shakespeare and Co. She published it out of her own pocket, and only 1000 copies were printed.

You said &quot;why aren’t you publishing books that can be held up to those names?&quot; but it&#039;s hardly as though publishers have enormous piles of world-changing literature just languishing in their inboxes. Certainly, they might have some experimental pieces lying around, but experimental doesn&#039;t necessarily mean good. Geniuses aren&#039;t born every day. If someone would WRITE something brilliant, even if publishers shied away from it, I feel sure it would find its way out into the world sooner or later. After all, in this age of mass-communication word-of-mouth is more powerful than it has ever been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can’t think of most any publisher, even the major and innovative independents, that would release Ulysses again right now, if instead of an accepted masterpiece, it were a third book by some Irish guy who had published a collection of short fiction and a weird novella.&#8221;</p>
<p>You make it sound like the publication of Ulysses was a walk in the park. It wasn&#8217;t. Nobody wanted to publish Ulysses back in 1922 either. It was turned down by every publisher he approached, and in the end Joyce resorted to Sylvia Beach, an American woman who owned a bookshop in Paris called Shakespeare and Co. She published it out of her own pocket, and only 1000 copies were printed.</p>
<p>You said &#8220;why aren’t you publishing books that can be held up to those names?&#8221; but it&#8217;s hardly as though publishers have enormous piles of world-changing literature just languishing in their inboxes. Certainly, they might have some experimental pieces lying around, but experimental doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean good. Geniuses aren&#8217;t born every day. If someone would WRITE something brilliant, even if publishers shied away from it, I feel sure it would find its way out into the world sooner or later. After all, in this age of mass-communication word-of-mouth is more powerful than it has ever been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tao Lin Contest #1 Entry &#171; Pop Serial</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-86163</link>
		<dc:creator>Tao Lin Contest #1 Entry &#171; Pop Serial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-86163</guid>
		<description>[...] existence because of a post about how there are no James Joyces anymore. That post is here. That post got ~5 kajillion hits, because people have a lot of opinions about James Joyce, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] existence because of a post about how there are no James Joyces anymore. That post is here. That post got ~5 kajillion hits, because people have a lot of opinions about James Joyce, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Favor!te Things 2009: Kevin &#8211; youritlist.com</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-43673</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Favor!te Things 2009: Kevin &#8211; youritlist.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-43673</guid>
		<description>[...] Favor!te Blog/Website: HTMLGiant. Because it contained the Best Essay of 2009: Blake Butler&#8217;s &#8220;James Joyce does not exist.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Favor!te Blog/Website: HTMLGiant. Because it contained the Best Essay of 2009: Blake Butler&#8217;s &#8220;James Joyce does not exist.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTMLGIANT / A Heaven of Me and Kyle Minor</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-30581</link>
		<dc:creator>HTMLGIANT / A Heaven of Me and Kyle Minor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-30581</guid>
		<description>[...] by 300+ comments thread on Blake Butler&#8217;s now-infamous &#8220;James Joyce Does Not Exist&#8221; post, Kyle Minor and I had a critical conversation about Joshua Cohen&#8217;s A Heaven of Others. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by 300+ comments thread on Blake Butler&#8217;s now-infamous &#8220;James Joyce Does Not Exist&#8221; post, Kyle Minor and I had a critical conversation about Joshua Cohen&#8217;s A Heaven of Others. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-29814</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-29814</guid>
		<description>George Bernard Shaw once wrote, &quot;In Ireland they try to make a cat clean by rubbing its nose in its own fifth. mr Joyce has tried the same treatment on the human subject&quot;.

And Tom Stoppard said about james Joyce, &quot;An essentially private man who wished his total indifference to public notice be universally recognized.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bernard Shaw once wrote, &#8220;In Ireland they try to make a cat clean by rubbing its nose in its own fifth. mr Joyce has tried the same treatment on the human subject&#8221;.</p>
<p>And Tom Stoppard said about james Joyce, &#8220;An essentially private man who wished his total indifference to public notice be universally recognized.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-114922</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-114922</guid>
		<description>George Bernard Shaw once wrote, &quot;In Ireland they try to make a cat clean by rubbing its nose in its own fifth. mr Joyce has tried the same treatment on the human subject&quot;.

And Tom Stoppard said about james Joyce, &quot;An essentially private man who wished his total indifference to public notice be universally recognized.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bernard Shaw once wrote, &#8220;In Ireland they try to make a cat clean by rubbing its nose in its own fifth. mr Joyce has tried the same treatment on the human subject&#8221;.</p>
<p>And Tom Stoppard said about james Joyce, &#8220;An essentially private man who wished his total indifference to public notice be universally recognized.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTMLGIANT / Three Cheers for Blake!</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/behind-the-scenes/james-joyce-does-not-exist/comment-page-4/#comment-28587</link>
		<dc:creator>HTMLGIANT / Three Cheers for Blake!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=14264#comment-28587</guid>
		<description>[...] remember when Blake posted about how major publishing houses have basically stopped taking on challenging, innovative fiction? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remember when Blake posted about how major publishing houses have basically stopped taking on challenging, innovative fiction? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

