<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Chic for Old Cranky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/</link>
	<description>the internet literature magazine blog of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-40898</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-40898</guid>
		<description>I prefer the John Calder editions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the John Calder editions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-127703</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-127703</guid>
		<description>I prefer the John Calder editions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the John Calder editions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clapper</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-40824</link>
		<dc:creator>Clapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-40824</guid>
		<description>I like the idea, and individually, I like the way most of them look. I sort of wish they&#039;d remained constant with the fonts and with the wraparounds, though. If you&#039;re gonna go this minimal on the cover, why not keep the variation minimal, too? I guess size-wise, you&#039;d have to change a bit because of lengths of titles, but... different colors, different choices for bleeding the text or not, bold/not bold... the best one (to me) is Endgame. That looks exactly like what I&#039;d think a Beckett text would look like. Black, a little hard to read, bare. I already like the play; I may have to order that one, just because of how much the cover matches my idea of the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea, and individually, I like the way most of them look. I sort of wish they&#8217;d remained constant with the fonts and with the wraparounds, though. If you&#8217;re gonna go this minimal on the cover, why not keep the variation minimal, too? I guess size-wise, you&#8217;d have to change a bit because of lengths of titles, but&#8230; different colors, different choices for bleeding the text or not, bold/not bold&#8230; the best one (to me) is Endgame. That looks exactly like what I&#8217;d think a Beckett text would look like. Black, a little hard to read, bare. I already like the play; I may have to order that one, just because of how much the cover matches my idea of the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clapper</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-127702</link>
		<dc:creator>Clapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-127702</guid>
		<description>I like the idea, and individually, I like the way most of them look. I sort of wish they&#039;d remained constant with the fonts and with the wraparounds, though. If you&#039;re gonna go this minimal on the cover, why not keep the variation minimal, too? I guess size-wise, you&#039;d have to change a bit because of lengths of titles, but... different colors, different choices for bleeding the text or not, bold/not bold... the best one (to me) is Endgame. That looks exactly like what I&#039;d think a Beckett text would look like. Black, a little hard to read, bare. I already like the play; I may have to order that one, just because of how much the cover matches my idea of the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea, and individually, I like the way most of them look. I sort of wish they&#8217;d remained constant with the fonts and with the wraparounds, though. If you&#8217;re gonna go this minimal on the cover, why not keep the variation minimal, too? I guess size-wise, you&#8217;d have to change a bit because of lengths of titles, but&#8230; different colors, different choices for bleeding the text or not, bold/not bold&#8230; the best one (to me) is Endgame. That looks exactly like what I&#8217;d think a Beckett text would look like. Black, a little hard to read, bare. I already like the play; I may have to order that one, just because of how much the cover matches my idea of the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brighton</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-40809</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Brighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-40809</guid>
		<description>I like the kind of dirty, crass line drawings on the oldschool penguins. These are too clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the kind of dirty, crass line drawings on the oldschool penguins. These are too clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brighton</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-127701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Brighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-127701</guid>
		<description>I like the kind of dirty, crass line drawings on the oldschool penguins. These are too clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the kind of dirty, crass line drawings on the oldschool penguins. These are too clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Butler</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-40779</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-40779</guid>
		<description>yeah, it&#039;s a weird fit. those jpegs are kinda tiny and out of contex on a browser it seems though.  i wonder what they&#039;d look like actually in hand. still, weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, it&#8217;s a weird fit. those jpegs are kinda tiny and out of contex on a browser it seems though.  i wonder what they&#8217;d look like actually in hand. still, weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Butler</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-127700</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-127700</guid>
		<description>yeah, it&#039;s a weird fit. those jpegs are kinda tiny and out of contex on a browser it seems though.  i wonder what they&#039;d look like actually in hand. still, weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, it&#8217;s a weird fit. those jpegs are kinda tiny and out of contex on a browser it seems though.  i wonder what they&#8217;d look like actually in hand. still, weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Robinson</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-40767</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-40767</guid>
		<description>Whoa, that&#039;s pervy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, that&#8217;s pervy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Robinson</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/too-chic-for-old-cranky/comment-page-1/#comment-127699</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19740#comment-127699</guid>
		<description>Whoa, that&#039;s pervy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, that&#8217;s pervy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

