<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BEST MOVIES OF THE DECADE (THE NEW YORKER&#8217;S AND MINE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/</link>
	<description>the internet literature magazine blog of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-44808</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-44808</guid>
		<description>word nathan, word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>word nathan, word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-44807</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-44807</guid>
		<description>i disagree.  the movie is still banned in the US.  its story challenged a lot of western thought AND it came out right around all of the high school killings here in grand ol&#039; america.

i think it is still one of the most challenging movies made in the past 20 years and it would have not ever been released in the US even by an indie producer.

i have to put it at the top.

now the sequel was bullshit.  pure $$$ garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i disagree.  the movie is still banned in the US.  its story challenged a lot of western thought AND it came out right around all of the high school killings here in grand ol&#8217; america.</p>
<p>i think it is still one of the most challenging movies made in the past 20 years and it would have not ever been released in the US even by an indie producer.</p>
<p>i have to put it at the top.</p>
<p>now the sequel was bullshit.  pure $$$ garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-130790</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-130790</guid>
		<description>i disagree.  the movie is still banned in the US.  its story challenged a lot of western thought AND it came out right around all of the high school killings here in grand ol&#039; america.

i think it is still one of the most challenging movies made in the past 20 years and it would have not ever been released in the US even by an indie producer.

i have to put it at the top.

now the sequel was bullshit.  pure $$$ garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i disagree.  the movie is still banned in the US.  its story challenged a lot of western thought AND it came out right around all of the high school killings here in grand ol&#8217; america.</p>
<p>i think it is still one of the most challenging movies made in the past 20 years and it would have not ever been released in the US even by an indie producer.</p>
<p>i have to put it at the top.</p>
<p>now the sequel was bullshit.  pure $$$ garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-130791</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-130791</guid>
		<description>word nathan, word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>word nathan, word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-44806</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-44806</guid>
		<description>it is a really slow movie i think.

most of the movies i picked were selected because either i loved the story to death or i felt the film was new and innovative in terms of film making, something i hadn&#039;t watched on the big screen before.

ghost dog incorporated a lot of japanese style but in a western film.  jarmusch is the first i&#039;ve seen do this successfully.

but to answer your question, i think most people were expecting a mindless kill spree assassin movie which ghost dog clearly is not nor was it ever marketed to be such a thing.

people find it difficult to view something objectively in other words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a really slow movie i think.</p>
<p>most of the movies i picked were selected because either i loved the story to death or i felt the film was new and innovative in terms of film making, something i hadn&#8217;t watched on the big screen before.</p>
<p>ghost dog incorporated a lot of japanese style but in a western film.  jarmusch is the first i&#8217;ve seen do this successfully.</p>
<p>but to answer your question, i think most people were expecting a mindless kill spree assassin movie which ghost dog clearly is not nor was it ever marketed to be such a thing.</p>
<p>people find it difficult to view something objectively in other words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-130789</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-130789</guid>
		<description>it is a really slow movie i think.

most of the movies i picked were selected because either i loved the story to death or i felt the film was new and innovative in terms of film making, something i hadn&#039;t watched on the big screen before.

ghost dog incorporated a lot of japanese style but in a western film.  jarmusch is the first i&#039;ve seen do this successfully.

but to answer your question, i think most people were expecting a mindless kill spree assassin movie which ghost dog clearly is not nor was it ever marketed to be such a thing.

people find it difficult to view something objectively in other words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a really slow movie i think.</p>
<p>most of the movies i picked were selected because either i loved the story to death or i felt the film was new and innovative in terms of film making, something i hadn&#8217;t watched on the big screen before.</p>
<p>ghost dog incorporated a lot of japanese style but in a western film.  jarmusch is the first i&#8217;ve seen do this successfully.</p>
<p>but to answer your question, i think most people were expecting a mindless kill spree assassin movie which ghost dog clearly is not nor was it ever marketed to be such a thing.</p>
<p>people find it difficult to view something objectively in other words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O. Williams</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-44322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-44322</guid>
		<description>1. Werckmeister Harmonies
2. Time Regained [1999]
3. Cache
4. Songs from the Second Floor
5. American Psycho
6. George Washington
7. Old Joy
8. The Limits of Control
9. You Can Count on Me
10. [left empty for the one(s) I can&#039;t remember now]

I&#039;ll have to see The Assassination... at some point. I also meant to see Ballast, but was never able. I would have liked to put some Lynch or Moodysson on my list, but they just didn&#039;t make it. Morvern Callar was so close. (The addition of Time Regained from 1999 bumped it off the list. Maybe not fair.) Also, most of the comedies (except Songs from the Second Floor) like In the Loop, Ghost World, Anchorman, etc just couldn&#039;t crack it. But I know I&#039;m missing at least one thing I loved, and I just can&#039;t remember what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Werckmeister Harmonies<br />
2. Time Regained [1999]<br />
3. Cache<br />
4. Songs from the Second Floor<br />
5. American Psycho<br />
6. George Washington<br />
7. Old Joy<br />
8. The Limits of Control<br />
9. You Can Count on Me<br />
10. [left empty for the one(s) I can't remember now]</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to see The Assassination&#8230; at some point. I also meant to see Ballast, but was never able. I would have liked to put some Lynch or Moodysson on my list, but they just didn&#8217;t make it. Morvern Callar was so close. (The addition of Time Regained from 1999 bumped it off the list. Maybe not fair.) Also, most of the comedies (except Songs from the Second Floor) like In the Loop, Ghost World, Anchorman, etc just couldn&#8217;t crack it. But I know I&#8217;m missing at least one thing I loved, and I just can&#8217;t remember what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O. Williams</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-130788</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-130788</guid>
		<description>1. Werckmeister Harmonies
2. Time Regained [1999]
3. Cache
4. Songs from the Second Floor
5. American Psycho
6. George Washington
7. Old Joy
8. The Limits of Control
9. You Can Count on Me
10. [left empty for the one(s) I can&#039;t remember now]

I&#039;ll have to see The Assassination... at some point. I also meant to see Ballast, but was never able. I would have liked to put some Lynch or Moodysson on my list, but they just didn&#039;t make it. Morvern Callar was so close. (The addition of Time Regained from 1999 bumped it off the list. Maybe not fair.) Also, most of the comedies (except Songs from the Second Floor) like In the Loop, Ghost World, Anchorman, etc just couldn&#039;t crack it. But I know I&#039;m missing at least one thing I loved, and I just can&#039;t remember what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Werckmeister Harmonies<br />
2. Time Regained [1999]<br />
3. Cache<br />
4. Songs from the Second Floor<br />
5. American Psycho<br />
6. George Washington<br />
7. Old Joy<br />
8. The Limits of Control<br />
9. You Can Count on Me<br />
10. [left empty for the one(s) I can't remember now]</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to see The Assassination&#8230; at some point. I also meant to see Ballast, but was never able. I would have liked to put some Lynch or Moodysson on my list, but they just didn&#8217;t make it. Morvern Callar was so close. (The addition of Time Regained from 1999 bumped it off the list. Maybe not fair.) Also, most of the comedies (except Songs from the Second Floor) like In the Loop, Ghost World, Anchorman, etc just couldn&#8217;t crack it. But I know I&#8217;m missing at least one thing I loved, and I just can&#8217;t remember what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-44320</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-44320</guid>
		<description>rodger dodger = all time great american comedy. isabella rosellina&#039;s performance alone would land it on my list -- she&#039;s had greater roles, prob, but i can&#039;t think of anything else where she&#039;s so loose and natural. and campbell scott is brilliant. (director dylan kidd&#039;s follow-up, ps, w/laura linney, is awful, sadly -- and infuriating.)

i don&#039;t know if when i&#039;m infuriated by a movie as opposed to just &quot;meh&quot; about it it&#039;s a sign that there&#039;s &quot;something there,&quot; and i&#039;m pissed it failed at whatever it was going for, or if it&#039;s just that it&#039;s a really bad movie. 

for instance, i thought cache was lame and and derivative and totally stupid and obvious in its manipulations and indeterminancies, and children of men actually had me trembling with rage. so stupid! so simplisitc!  shut up michael caine character, please, yr killing me. (battle scene was cool, tho.) most movies that attempt a &quot;serious&quot; response to the political scene provoke similar reactions in me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rodger dodger = all time great american comedy. isabella rosellina&#8217;s performance alone would land it on my list &#8212; she&#8217;s had greater roles, prob, but i can&#8217;t think of anything else where she&#8217;s so loose and natural. and campbell scott is brilliant. (director dylan kidd&#8217;s follow-up, ps, w/laura linney, is awful, sadly &#8212; and infuriating.)</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t know if when i&#8217;m infuriated by a movie as opposed to just &#8220;meh&#8221; about it it&#8217;s a sign that there&#8217;s &#8220;something there,&#8221; and i&#8217;m pissed it failed at whatever it was going for, or if it&#8217;s just that it&#8217;s a really bad movie. </p>
<p>for instance, i thought cache was lame and and derivative and totally stupid and obvious in its manipulations and indeterminancies, and children of men actually had me trembling with rage. so stupid! so simplisitc!  shut up michael caine character, please, yr killing me. (battle scene was cool, tho.) most movies that attempt a &#8220;serious&#8221; response to the political scene provoke similar reactions in me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/film/best-movies-of-the-decade-the-new-yorkers-mine/comment-page-2/#comment-130787</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=20699#comment-130787</guid>
		<description>rodger dodger = all time great american comedy. isabella rosellina&#039;s performance alone would land it on my list -- she&#039;s had greater roles, prob, but i can&#039;t think of anything else where she&#039;s so loose and natural. and campbell scott is brilliant. (director dylan kidd&#039;s follow-up, ps, w/laura linney, is awful, sadly -- and infuriating.)

i don&#039;t know if when i&#039;m infuriated by a movie as opposed to just &quot;meh&quot; about it it&#039;s a sign that there&#039;s &quot;something there,&quot; and i&#039;m pissed it failed at whatever it was going for, or if it&#039;s just that it&#039;s a really bad movie. 

for instance, i thought cache was lame and and derivative and totally stupid and obvious in its manipulations and indeterminancies, and children of men actually had me trembling with rage. so stupid! so simplisitc!  shut up michael caine character, please, yr killing me. (battle scene was cool, tho.) most movies that attempt a &quot;serious&quot; response to the political scene provoke similar reactions in me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rodger dodger = all time great american comedy. isabella rosellina&#8217;s performance alone would land it on my list &#8212; she&#8217;s had greater roles, prob, but i can&#8217;t think of anything else where she&#8217;s so loose and natural. and campbell scott is brilliant. (director dylan kidd&#8217;s follow-up, ps, w/laura linney, is awful, sadly &#8212; and infuriating.)</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t know if when i&#8217;m infuriated by a movie as opposed to just &#8220;meh&#8221; about it it&#8217;s a sign that there&#8217;s &#8220;something there,&#8221; and i&#8217;m pissed it failed at whatever it was going for, or if it&#8217;s just that it&#8217;s a really bad movie. </p>
<p>for instance, i thought cache was lame and and derivative and totally stupid and obvious in its manipulations and indeterminancies, and children of men actually had me trembling with rage. so stupid! so simplisitc!  shut up michael caine character, please, yr killing me. (battle scene was cool, tho.) most movies that attempt a &#8220;serious&#8221; response to the political scene provoke similar reactions in me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

