<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separation of Artist and Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/</link>
	<description>the internet literature magazine blog of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher higgs</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-41005</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher higgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-41005</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,

Heiddie&#039;s relationship with the NSDAP is well documented.  He took Husserl&#039;s position as Rector at University of Freiburg, Husserl having to split on account of being Jewish and all.  So there&#039;s not much mystery there.  My argument is: so what?  He was a Nazi.  That doesn&#039;t mean that his contribution to the study of ontology is any less badass.

In terms of Paul deMan...dude wrote for a pro-Nazi newspaper in Belgium when he was in his late teens-early twenties.  What on earth that would have to do with his contribution to literary criticism thirty years later is beyond me.

Yes, in this comment I referred to Martin Heidegger as Heiddie.  Had to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>Heiddie&#8217;s relationship with the NSDAP is well documented.  He took Husserl&#8217;s position as Rector at University of Freiburg, Husserl having to split on account of being Jewish and all.  So there&#8217;s not much mystery there.  My argument is: so what?  He was a Nazi.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that his contribution to the study of ontology is any less badass.</p>
<p>In terms of Paul deMan&#8230;dude wrote for a pro-Nazi newspaper in Belgium when he was in his late teens-early twenties.  What on earth that would have to do with his contribution to literary criticism thirty years later is beyond me.</p>
<p>Yes, in this comment I referred to Martin Heidegger as Heiddie.  Had to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher higgs</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-127669</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher higgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-127669</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,

Heiddie&#039;s relationship with the NSDAP is well documented.  He took Husserl&#039;s position as Rector at University of Freiburg, Husserl having to split on account of being Jewish and all.  So there&#039;s not much mystery there.  My argument is: so what?  He was a Nazi.  That doesn&#039;t mean that his contribution to the study of ontology is any less badass.

In terms of Paul deMan...dude wrote for a pro-Nazi newspaper in Belgium when he was in his late teens-early twenties.  What on earth that would have to do with his contribution to literary criticism thirty years later is beyond me.

Yes, in this comment I referred to Martin Heidegger as Heiddie.  Had to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>Heiddie&#8217;s relationship with the NSDAP is well documented.  He took Husserl&#8217;s position as Rector at University of Freiburg, Husserl having to split on account of being Jewish and all.  So there&#8217;s not much mystery there.  My argument is: so what?  He was a Nazi.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that his contribution to the study of ontology is any less badass.</p>
<p>In terms of Paul deMan&#8230;dude wrote for a pro-Nazi newspaper in Belgium when he was in his late teens-early twenties.  What on earth that would have to do with his contribution to literary criticism thirty years later is beyond me.</p>
<p>Yes, in this comment I referred to Martin Heidegger as Heiddie.  Had to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-40998</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-40998</guid>
		<description>i want to rape every one here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to rape every one here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jereme</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-127668</link>
		<dc:creator>jereme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-127668</guid>
		<description>i want to rape every one here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to rape every one here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamM</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-40995</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-40995</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very surprise nobody mentioned Emmanuel Faye&#039;s 2005 book.  He claims to have found in Heidegger&#039;s 1930&#039;s unpublished lecture notes several references or indications of national socialism.  It&#039;s being published in English soon.  The point being that for a lot of people why we we should read Heidegger is still as unresolved as the question of how we should read him.  And it&#039;s the same for deMan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very surprise nobody mentioned Emmanuel Faye&#8217;s 2005 book.  He claims to have found in Heidegger&#8217;s 1930&#8242;s unpublished lecture notes several references or indications of national socialism.  It&#8217;s being published in English soon.  The point being that for a lot of people why we we should read Heidegger is still as unresolved as the question of how we should read him.  And it&#8217;s the same for deMan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamM</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-127667</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-127667</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very surprise nobody mentioned Emmanuel Faye&#039;s 2005 book.  He claims to have found in Heidegger&#039;s 1930&#039;s unpublished lecture notes several references or indications of national socialism.  It&#039;s being published in English soon.  The point being that for a lot of people why we we should read Heidegger is still as unresolved as the question of how we should read him.  And it&#039;s the same for deMan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very surprise nobody mentioned Emmanuel Faye&#8217;s 2005 book.  He claims to have found in Heidegger&#8217;s 1930&#8242;s unpublished lecture notes several references or indications of national socialism.  It&#8217;s being published in English soon.  The point being that for a lot of people why we we should read Heidegger is still as unresolved as the question of how we should read him.  And it&#8217;s the same for deMan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael james</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-40902</link>
		<dc:creator>michael james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-40902</guid>
		<description>No one said it was a picnic. But it is forgotten that although we live in a male-centric society, women hold more power than most know. We aren&#039;t talking about women who were raped. We are talking about the perceptions of rape. I realized that you entirely set up that above case process from the female perspective when it is true that men are rape all the time. Not as much as women, of course, but they are. The same can be said of spousal abuse, or abuse in general. Though it is the men who are handcufed and taken away when the call is made. It is actually police procedure that if the man is defending himself against assault, he is automatically taken away. Unless the police see the act of her initiating assault.

So lemme say again, in terms of *accusing* someone of rape, the cards are stacked against the male. Not in terms of a true situation of a woman being raped, and then the process of facing her rapist. No matter how you spin it, in terms of accusing, the male in the situation is facing an uphill battle.

I hate these conversations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one said it was a picnic. But it is forgotten that although we live in a male-centric society, women hold more power than most know. We aren&#8217;t talking about women who were raped. We are talking about the perceptions of rape. I realized that you entirely set up that above case process from the female perspective when it is true that men are rape all the time. Not as much as women, of course, but they are. The same can be said of spousal abuse, or abuse in general. Though it is the men who are handcufed and taken away when the call is made. It is actually police procedure that if the man is defending himself against assault, he is automatically taken away. Unless the police see the act of her initiating assault.</p>
<p>So lemme say again, in terms of *accusing* someone of rape, the cards are stacked against the male. Not in terms of a true situation of a woman being raped, and then the process of facing her rapist. No matter how you spin it, in terms of accusing, the male in the situation is facing an uphill battle.</p>
<p>I hate these conversations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael james</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-127666</link>
		<dc:creator>michael james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-127666</guid>
		<description>No one said it was a picnic. But it is forgotten that although we live in a male-centric society, women hold more power than most know. We aren&#039;t talking about women who were raped. We are talking about the perceptions of rape. I realized that you entirely set up that above case process from the female perspective when it is true that men are rape all the time. Not as much as women, of course, but they are. The same can be said of spousal abuse, or abuse in general. Though it is the men who are handcufed and taken away when the call is made. It is actually police procedure that if the man is defending himself against assault, he is automatically taken away. Unless the police see the act of her initiating assault.

So lemme say again, in terms of *accusing* someone of rape, the cards are stacked against the male. Not in terms of a true situation of a woman being raped, and then the process of facing her rapist. No matter how you spin it, in terms of accusing, the male in the situation is facing an uphill battle.

I hate these conversations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one said it was a picnic. But it is forgotten that although we live in a male-centric society, women hold more power than most know. We aren&#8217;t talking about women who were raped. We are talking about the perceptions of rape. I realized that you entirely set up that above case process from the female perspective when it is true that men are rape all the time. Not as much as women, of course, but they are. The same can be said of spousal abuse, or abuse in general. Though it is the men who are handcufed and taken away when the call is made. It is actually police procedure that if the man is defending himself against assault, he is automatically taken away. Unless the police see the act of her initiating assault.</p>
<p>So lemme say again, in terms of *accusing* someone of rape, the cards are stacked against the male. Not in terms of a true situation of a woman being raped, and then the process of facing her rapist. No matter how you spin it, in terms of accusing, the male in the situation is facing an uphill battle.</p>
<p>I hate these conversations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael james</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-40901</link>
		<dc:creator>michael james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-40901</guid>
		<description>mind.... blown....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mind&#8230;. blown&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael james</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/reviews/seperation-of-artist-and-art/comment-page-2/#comment-127665</link>
		<dc:creator>michael james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=19693#comment-127665</guid>
		<description>mind.... blown....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mind&#8230;. blown&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

