<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EDITORS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/</link>
	<description>the internet literature magazine blog of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clapper</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-19761</link>
		<dc:creator>Clapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-19761</guid>
		<description>Huh. I wonder who&#039;s sending out all the personal rejections. It ain&#039;t me. I&#039;m form, form, form, baby. Know why? Because some writers want personalized rejections, some want form. And it&#039;s impossible to know which are which. I used to assume that all writers wanted personal rejections (I like them personally), so in the beginning, ALL of my rejections were personalized. In many cases, I even recommended more appropriate markets. And then the hostile replies started coming. &quot;Who asked you?!&quot; but with more profanity. So... since I don&#039;t (and can&#039;t) know what every writer wants: form, form, form, baby.

(There are, of course, exceptions to this: when I absolutely know the writer well enough to know that (s)he likes more personal rejections. But they&#039;re rare.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. I wonder who&#8217;s sending out all the personal rejections. It ain&#8217;t me. I&#8217;m form, form, form, baby. Know why? Because some writers want personalized rejections, some want form. And it&#8217;s impossible to know which are which. I used to assume that all writers wanted personal rejections (I like them personally), so in the beginning, ALL of my rejections were personalized. In many cases, I even recommended more appropriate markets. And then the hostile replies started coming. &#8220;Who asked you?!&#8221; but with more profanity. So&#8230; since I don&#8217;t (and can&#8217;t) know what every writer wants: form, form, form, baby.</p>
<p>(There are, of course, exceptions to this: when I absolutely know the writer well enough to know that (s)he likes more personal rejections. But they&#8217;re rare.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clapper</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-110728</link>
		<dc:creator>Clapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-110728</guid>
		<description>Huh. I wonder who&#039;s sending out all the personal rejections. It ain&#039;t me. I&#039;m form, form, form, baby. Know why? Because some writers want personalized rejections, some want form. And it&#039;s impossible to know which are which. I used to assume that all writers wanted personal rejections (I like them personally), so in the beginning, ALL of my rejections were personalized. In many cases, I even recommended more appropriate markets. And then the hostile replies started coming. &quot;Who asked you?!&quot; but with more profanity. So... since I don&#039;t (and can&#039;t) know what every writer wants: form, form, form, baby.

(There are, of course, exceptions to this: when I absolutely know the writer well enough to know that (s)he likes more personal rejections. But they&#039;re rare.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. I wonder who&#8217;s sending out all the personal rejections. It ain&#8217;t me. I&#8217;m form, form, form, baby. Know why? Because some writers want personalized rejections, some want form. And it&#8217;s impossible to know which are which. I used to assume that all writers wanted personal rejections (I like them personally), so in the beginning, ALL of my rejections were personalized. In many cases, I even recommended more appropriate markets. And then the hostile replies started coming. &#8220;Who asked you?!&#8221; but with more profanity. So&#8230; since I don&#8217;t (and can&#8217;t) know what every writer wants: form, form, form, baby.</p>
<p>(There are, of course, exceptions to this: when I absolutely know the writer well enough to know that (s)he likes more personal rejections. But they&#8217;re rare.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brighton</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-19736</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Brighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-19736</guid>
		<description>Issue One was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issue One was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brighton</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-110727</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Brighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-110727</guid>
		<description>Issue One was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issue One was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan (Nate) Tyree</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-19678</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan (Nate) Tyree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-19678</guid>
		<description>I like this conversation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this conversation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan (Nate) Tyree</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-110726</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan (Nate) Tyree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-110726</guid>
		<description>I like this conversation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this conversation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jones-Yelvington</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-19677</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jones-Yelvington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-19677</guid>
		<description>I meant for that to appear on the bottom, not in the Roxane thread. 

But I agree Roxane is awesome -- a wonderful editor and she&#039;s doing so much to contribute to the broader online lit community/communities. 

I also really like her stories, esp the ones in decomp and You Must be this Tall to Ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant for that to appear on the bottom, not in the Roxane thread. </p>
<p>But I agree Roxane is awesome &#8212; a wonderful editor and she&#8217;s doing so much to contribute to the broader online lit community/communities. </p>
<p>I also really like her stories, esp the ones in decomp and You Must be this Tall to Ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jones-Yelvington</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-110725</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jones-Yelvington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-110725</guid>
		<description>I meant for that to appear on the bottom, not in the Roxane thread. 

But I agree Roxane is awesome -- a wonderful editor and she&#039;s doing so much to contribute to the broader online lit community/communities. 

I also really like her stories, esp the ones in decomp and You Must be this Tall to Ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant for that to appear on the bottom, not in the Roxane thread. </p>
<p>But I agree Roxane is awesome &#8212; a wonderful editor and she&#8217;s doing so much to contribute to the broader online lit community/communities. </p>
<p>I also really like her stories, esp the ones in decomp and You Must be this Tall to Ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jones-Yelvington</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-19676</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jones-Yelvington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-19676</guid>
		<description>Is it too late to add to this thread? 

An editor once praised but still rejected a piece because he didn&#039;t think I wrote convincingly as a woman.

The story&#039;s narrator was male. 

So I added a sentence early in the piece to clarify gender and the story was later accepted by Wigleaf. 

It was actually an important learning experience -- I realized that the whole &quot;readers will assume your character is the same gender as you until you tell them otherwise&quot; line does not apply when your narrator begins the piece fantasizing about getting fucked by a dude. 

The pitfalls of writing as a Queer and not always realizing what unconscious assumptions most of the rest of the world brings to the table. ...Can be like a kind of reverse naivete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it too late to add to this thread? </p>
<p>An editor once praised but still rejected a piece because he didn&#8217;t think I wrote convincingly as a woman.</p>
<p>The story&#8217;s narrator was male. </p>
<p>So I added a sentence early in the piece to clarify gender and the story was later accepted by Wigleaf. </p>
<p>It was actually an important learning experience &#8212; I realized that the whole &#8220;readers will assume your character is the same gender as you until you tell them otherwise&#8221; line does not apply when your narrator begins the piece fantasizing about getting fucked by a dude. </p>
<p>The pitfalls of writing as a Queer and not always realizing what unconscious assumptions most of the rest of the world brings to the table. &#8230;Can be like a kind of reverse naivete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jones-Yelvington</title>
		<link>http://htmlgiant.com/snippet/editors/comment-page-2/#comment-110724</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jones-Yelvington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmlgiant.com/?p=11521#comment-110724</guid>
		<description>Is it too late to add to this thread? 

An editor once praised but still rejected a piece because he didn&#039;t think I wrote convincingly as a woman.

The story&#039;s narrator was male. 

So I added a sentence early in the piece to clarify gender and the story was later accepted by Wigleaf. 

It was actually an important learning experience -- I realized that the whole &quot;readers will assume your character is the same gender as you until you tell them otherwise&quot; line does not apply when your narrator begins the piece fantasizing about getting fucked by a dude. 

The pitfalls of writing as a Queer and not always realizing what unconscious assumptions most of the rest of the world brings to the table. ...Can be like a kind of reverse naivete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it too late to add to this thread? </p>
<p>An editor once praised but still rejected a piece because he didn&#8217;t think I wrote convincingly as a woman.</p>
<p>The story&#8217;s narrator was male. </p>
<p>So I added a sentence early in the piece to clarify gender and the story was later accepted by Wigleaf. </p>
<p>It was actually an important learning experience &#8212; I realized that the whole &#8220;readers will assume your character is the same gender as you until you tell them otherwise&#8221; line does not apply when your narrator begins the piece fantasizing about getting fucked by a dude. </p>
<p>The pitfalls of writing as a Queer and not always realizing what unconscious assumptions most of the rest of the world brings to the table. &#8230;Can be like a kind of reverse naivete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

