Comments on: Friday Boobs http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/ the internet literature magazine blog of the future Fri, 25 May 2012 15:32:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sexy busty girls | ClubX.com : Sexy Clip,Sexy Video http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-15181 Sexy busty girls | ClubX.com : Sexy Clip,Sexy Video Sun, 10 May 2009 13:24:36 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-15181 [...] <HTMLGIANT> > Blog Archive » Friday Boobs [...] [...] <HTMLGIANT> > Blog Archive » Friday Boobs [...]

]]> By: keith n b http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-15135 keith n b Sat, 09 May 2009 23:46:42 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-15135 maybe i interpreted the navel statement too literally? or not literarily enough? yeah pr, you were the last stronghold of boobs friday. i'd be a tennis player for you. maybe i interpreted the navel statement too literally? or not literarily enough?

yeah pr, you were the last stronghold of boobs friday.

i’d be a tennis player for you.

]]> By: keith n b http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-106996 keith n b Sat, 09 May 2009 23:46:00 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-106996 maybe i interpreted the navel statement too literally? or not literarily enough? yeah pr, you were the last stronghold of boobs friday. i'd be a tennis player for you. maybe i interpreted the navel statement too literally? or not literarily enough?

yeah pr, you were the last stronghold of boobs friday.

i’d be a tennis player for you.

]]> By: becca http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-15120 becca Sat, 09 May 2009 18:23:24 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-15120 Hi Adam -- As far as I can tell from this post, what you're saying is that you're not a French Feminist. Can you allow for the fact that there are many types of feminism (within and outside of the academy), some of which you subscribe to? I'm glad you like the forum! Hi Adam — As far as I can tell from this post, what you’re saying is that you’re not a French Feminist. Can you allow for the fact that there are many types of feminism (within and outside of the academy), some of which you subscribe to?

I’m glad you like the forum!

]]> By: becca http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-106995 becca Sat, 09 May 2009 18:23:00 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-106995 Hi Adam -- As far as I can tell from this post, what you're saying is that you're not a French Feminist. Can you allow for the fact that there are many types of feminism (within and outside of the academy), some of which you subscribe to? I'm glad you like the forum! Hi Adam — As far as I can tell from this post, what you’re saying is that you’re not a French Feminist. Can you allow for the fact that there are many types of feminism (within and outside of the academy), some of which you subscribe to?

I’m glad you like the forum!

]]> By: pr http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-15108 pr Sat, 09 May 2009 14:58:10 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-15108 One must cut the cord. I've had two cords cut in front of my face. I hate bioligical explanations, but certain problematic societal issues are tied into biology, but not excused. How do we differ understanding from excuse? It's tricky. I'll pretend I'm a tri-gendered hermaphrodite for you, Keith. Also, I thought maybe there would be boobs in this post too and I got really excited and then felt a let down, not a "let down" like when my milk would gush into my breasts (that's called a let down too) but more like, aw, I'm not the only one who misses boobs friday! (I kept it going on -with love and gusto-way longer than anyone else..) And I was wrong. That said, I cracked myself up thinking about being a teenager sitting around reading GYN EcoloGY by Mary Daly. One must cut the cord. I’ve had two cords cut in front of my face. I hate bioligical explanations, but certain problematic societal issues are tied into biology, but not excused. How do we differ understanding from excuse? It’s tricky.

I’ll pretend I’m a tri-gendered hermaphrodite for you, Keith. Also, I thought maybe there would be boobs in this post too and I got really excited and then felt a let down, not a “let down” like when my milk would gush into my breasts (that’s called a let down too) but more like, aw, I’m not the only one who misses boobs friday! (I kept it going on -with love and gusto-way longer than anyone else..) And I was wrong.

That said, I cracked myself up thinking about being a teenager sitting around reading GYN EcoloGY by Mary Daly.

]]> By: pr http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-106994 pr Sat, 09 May 2009 14:58:00 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-106994 One must cut the cord. I've had two cords cut in front of my face. I hate bioligical explanations, but certain problematic societal issues are tied into biology, but not excused. How do we differ understanding from excuse? It's tricky. I'll pretend I'm a tri-gendered hermaphrodite for you, Keith. Also, I thought maybe there would be boobs in this post too and I got really excited and then felt a let down, not a "let down" like when my milk would gush into my breasts (that's called a let down too) but more like, aw, I'm not the only one who misses boobs friday! (I kept it going on -with love and gusto-way longer than anyone else..) And I was wrong. That said, I cracked myself up thinking about being a teenager sitting around reading GYN EcoloGY by Mary Daly. One must cut the cord. I’ve had two cords cut in front of my face. I hate bioligical explanations, but certain problematic societal issues are tied into biology, but not excused. How do we differ understanding from excuse? It’s tricky.

I’ll pretend I’m a tri-gendered hermaphrodite for you, Keith. Also, I thought maybe there would be boobs in this post too and I got really excited and then felt a let down, not a “let down” like when my milk would gush into my breasts (that’s called a let down too) but more like, aw, I’m not the only one who misses boobs friday! (I kept it going on -with love and gusto-way longer than anyone else..) And I was wrong.

That said, I cracked myself up thinking about being a teenager sitting around reading GYN EcoloGY by Mary Daly.

]]> By: keith n b http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-15077 keith n b Sat, 09 May 2009 01:24:57 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-15077 sometimes i think i'm a lesbian in a man's body. but that's not quite accurate. rather, i'd like to be a guy with less hair (even my toes are hairy) with suckling-activated lactating breasts and a non-viable vagina. then i would feel normal. but preferably all human animals would be hermaphroditically endowed while still retaining the tension-inducing flavor of opposite genders, or hell, how about a trinity of genders. then three-ways would be fulfilling for each partner of the party. also it wouldn't feel so weird to wear woman's clothes and put on make-up as it does now. there's nothing more anti-patriarchal and holistically unifying than a skirt. pants by their very nature are divisive and in that sense phallic. dualities are also divisive and thus phallic. we need a three-pronged dialectic that, when synthesized, culminates in a rhizomatic unity. honestly though, i thought i was going to see some boobs in this post. but if i had boobs (like i wish i did), i wonder if i would be intimidated by the objectification of other boobs whose archetypal spherehood mine own would have to live up to, or if i would just be happy to see boobs. i guess what i'm saying is (and i wouldn't have rambled this long if this topic, or i should say one that is both parallel and tangential to it, hasn't occupied my thoughts over the years) is that i'll never know what the significance of being a feminism is from the standpoint of a woman living in a patriarchally dominated society, nor will i ever know the glory of living in a universe of tri-gendered hermaphrodites, which (i am speaking from the heart here) makes me sad. but you really lost me at the beginning with the whole umbilical/navel discussion, if only at the level of pragmatics. would no one have a name? or would everyone be named navel? sometimes i think i’m a lesbian in a man’s body. but that’s not quite accurate. rather, i’d like to be a guy with less hair (even my toes are hairy) with suckling-activated lactating breasts and a non-viable vagina. then i would feel normal. but preferably all human animals would be hermaphroditically endowed while still retaining the tension-inducing flavor of opposite genders, or hell, how about a trinity of genders. then three-ways would be fulfilling for each partner of the party. also it wouldn’t feel so weird to wear woman’s clothes and put on make-up as it does now. there’s nothing more anti-patriarchal and holistically unifying than a skirt. pants by their very nature are divisive and in that sense phallic. dualities are also divisive and thus phallic. we need a three-pronged dialectic that, when synthesized, culminates in a rhizomatic unity. honestly though, i thought i was going to see some boobs in this post. but if i had boobs (like i wish i did), i wonder if i would be intimidated by the objectification of other boobs whose archetypal spherehood mine own would have to live up to, or if i would just be happy to see boobs. i guess what i’m saying is (and i wouldn’t have rambled this long if this topic, or i should say one that is both parallel and tangential to it, hasn’t occupied my thoughts over the years) is that i’ll never know what the significance of being a feminism is from the standpoint of a woman living in a patriarchally dominated society, nor will i ever know the glory of living in a universe of tri-gendered hermaphrodites, which (i am speaking from the heart here) makes me sad. but you really lost me at the beginning with the whole umbilical/navel discussion, if only at the level of pragmatics. would no one have a name? or would everyone be named navel?

]]> By: keith n b http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-106993 keith n b Sat, 09 May 2009 01:24:00 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-106993 sometimes i think i'm a lesbian in a man's body. but that's not quite accurate. rather, i'd like to be a guy with less hair (even my toes are hairy) with suckling-activated lactating breasts and a non-viable vagina. then i would feel normal. but preferably all human animals would be hermaphroditically endowed while still retaining the tension-inducing flavor of opposite genders, or hell, how about a trinity of genders. then three-ways would be fulfilling for each partner of the party. also it wouldn't feel so weird to wear woman's clothes and put on make-up as it does now. there's nothing more anti-patriarchal and holistically unifying than a skirt. pants by their very nature are divisive and in that sense phallic. dualities are also divisive and thus phallic. we need a three-pronged dialectic that, when synthesized, culminates in a rhizomatic unity. honestly though, i thought i was going to see some boobs in this post. but if i had boobs (like i wish i did), i wonder if i would be intimidated by the objectification of other boobs whose archetypal spherehood mine own would have to live up to, or if i would just be happy to see boobs. i guess what i'm saying is (and i wouldn't have rambled this long if this topic, or i should say one that is both parallel and tangential to it, hasn't occupied my thoughts over the years) is that i'll never know what the significance of being a feminism is from the standpoint of a woman living in a patriarchally dominated society, nor will i ever know the glory of living in a universe of tri-gendered hermaphrodites, which (i am speaking from the heart here) makes me sad. but you really lost me at the beginning with the whole umbilical/navel discussion, if only at the level of pragmatics. would no one have a name? or would everyone be named navel? sometimes i think i’m a lesbian in a man’s body. but that’s not quite accurate. rather, i’d like to be a guy with less hair (even my toes are hairy) with suckling-activated lactating breasts and a non-viable vagina. then i would feel normal. but preferably all human animals would be hermaphroditically endowed while still retaining the tension-inducing flavor of opposite genders, or hell, how about a trinity of genders. then three-ways would be fulfilling for each partner of the party. also it wouldn’t feel so weird to wear woman’s clothes and put on make-up as it does now. there’s nothing more anti-patriarchal and holistically unifying than a skirt. pants by their very nature are divisive and in that sense phallic. dualities are also divisive and thus phallic. we need a three-pronged dialectic that, when synthesized, culminates in a rhizomatic unity. honestly though, i thought i was going to see some boobs in this post. but if i had boobs (like i wish i did), i wonder if i would be intimidated by the objectification of other boobs whose archetypal spherehood mine own would have to live up to, or if i would just be happy to see boobs. i guess what i’m saying is (and i wouldn’t have rambled this long if this topic, or i should say one that is both parallel and tangential to it, hasn’t occupied my thoughts over the years) is that i’ll never know what the significance of being a feminism is from the standpoint of a woman living in a patriarchally dominated society, nor will i ever know the glory of living in a universe of tri-gendered hermaphrodites, which (i am speaking from the heart here) makes me sad. but you really lost me at the beginning with the whole umbilical/navel discussion, if only at the level of pragmatics. would no one have a name? or would everyone be named navel?

]]> By: pr http://htmlgiant.com/web-hype/friday-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-15065 pr Fri, 08 May 2009 23:24:10 +0000 http://htmlgiant.com/?p=8885#comment-15065 God bless Wisconsin working class towns and their baseball teams. What else do they have? Laverne and Shirley? Be nice. God bless Wisconsin working class towns and their baseball teams. What else do they have? Laverne and Shirley? Be nice.

]]>