November 1st, 2009 / 2:14 pm
Mean

Fourteen Hills, WTF?

fourteenhills

Fourteen Hills, I respect you, you had a cool anthology, and I’ve sent you stuff before because I like you (and will probably send you stuff again), but couldn’t you have just pretended this particular 775-day form rejection ‘got lost in the mail’? I mean, I understand shit sometimes falls behind the mini-fridge, but two years? Good grief – next time, just take the SASE and use it for yourself. Nobody will ever know.

What’s great about this is I can’t tell who has the better sense of humor: the author who reported this rejection on Duotrope or whoever on your staff decided to write this bit of copy: Fourteen Hills is a testimony to the fact that independent, innovative and experimental literature is alive and thriving.’

Tags: ,

25 Comments

  1. zachary german

      that is stupid, interesting

  2. zachary german

      that is stupid, interesting

  3. Vaughan Simons

      Oh, you know, those two year reply windows make a publication look really exclusive.

      Ill-mannered, too. Rude. Dismissive. And, frankly, pathetic.

      But ever so exclusive. (In the editors’ own minds, that is.)

  4. Vaughan Simons

      Oh, you know, those two year reply windows make a publication look really exclusive.

      Ill-mannered, too. Rude. Dismissive. And, frankly, pathetic.

      But ever so exclusive. (In the editors’ own minds, that is.)

  5. Michael James

      i think its the form rejection that does it, sometimes, you know… i wouldnt mind the long rejection, if it came with a personal rejection. i tend to believe long (and by long I mean a year and a half or so) deserve a personal rejection at least

  6. Michael James

      i think its the form rejection that does it, sometimes, you know… i wouldnt mind the long rejection, if it came with a personal rejection. i tend to believe long (and by long I mean a year and a half or so) deserve a personal rejection at least

  7. Ryan Call

      hey v. i dont think its necessarily because they want to be rude or look exclusive. i just think it was an oversight.

  8. Ryan Call

      i agree. i think a note apoologizing would have been nice.

  9. Ryan Call

      okay dude

  10. Ryan Call

      hey v. i dont think its necessarily because they want to be rude or look exclusive. i just think it was an oversight.

  11. Ryan Call

      i agree. i think a note apoologizing would have been nice.

  12. Ryan Call

      okay dude

  13. Richard

      Wow, that is insane. I’ve been waiting 4889 days on St. Ann’s and basically just gave up. What I don’t get is when the guidelines say 90 days and then it takes 400. WTF? This 700 day thing, man, if I wasn’t totally pissed off I’d probably laugh until I wet myself. Thanks for the post Ryan, good stuff.

  14. Richard

      Wow, that is insane. I’ve been waiting 4889 days on St. Ann’s and basically just gave up. What I don’t get is when the guidelines say 90 days and then it takes 400. WTF? This 700 day thing, man, if I wasn’t totally pissed off I’d probably laugh until I wet myself. Thanks for the post Ryan, good stuff.

  15. Michael

      St. Anne’s Review is a joke…they still have stuff from me that I sent 90 years ago. They should just say in their guidelines–“we only contact writers if we accept their work.”

  16. Michael

      St. Anne’s Review is a joke…they still have stuff from me that I sent 90 years ago. They should just say in their guidelines–“we only contact writers if we accept their work.”

  17. bl pawelek

      Yikes, 775! slightly chuckling.

      Yeah, give the benefit of the doubt is always good. They could have just trashed it.

  18. bl pawelek

      Yikes, 775! slightly chuckling.

      Yeah, give the benefit of the doubt is always good. They could have just trashed it.

  19. david e

      exactly. i think more places should just say we’ll contact you if we take it or have something insightful to say about why we’re not taking it.

  20. david e

      exactly. i think more places should just say we’ll contact you if we take it or have something insightful to say about why we’re not taking it.

  21. Fourteen Hills: The SFSU Revie
  22. Fourteen Hills: The SFSU Review
  23. Amy McDaniel

      16-day turnaround on this! they are getting better.

  24. Amy McDaniel

      16-day turnaround on this! they are getting better.

  25. HTMLGIANT / Fourteen Hills, I’m sorry

      […] The editors of Fourteen Hills have written a smart, generous, and, ultimately, positive response to my childish heckling of their having recently sent out a 700+ day form rejection. […]