May 9th, 2013 / 4:48 pm
Behind the Scenes

Soderbergh on Cinema is Soderbergh on Publishing

STEVEN_SODERBERGH_4

Film director Steven Soderbergh recently spoke at the 56th annual San Francisco International Film Festival. Before the speech Soderbergh said he would “drop some grenades.” Rarely does that happen. But what Soderbergh did was special – he pierced holes into an industry that is corporatizing and mainstreaming a once beautiful and individualistic art form.

I’m not a student of film nor would I consider myself knowledgeable on the industry. So after I read the full transcript of Soderbergh’s speech I wondered why I was so captivated. The answer was simple: I was reading a speech about the state of film, but as a writer, I was reading a speech about the state of publishing.

Soderbergh’s main sticking points: a bigger film budget yields bigger results, those in charge at the studios don’t watch cinema, artists need to be supported financially long term, ambiguity is toxic to a mainstream audience, and too much emphasis is placed on testing and pre-sales numbers, may sound like sour grapes to some, but I believe he’s accurate. I believe what he says about the state of cinema is in direct correlation to how I, and many, feel about the state of publishing.

Soderbergh loves strangeness and ambiguity in film. The ambiguity in my second novel, published by Penguin, was questioned by my editor. The push to extend the “reality storyline” in the book became a main focus during revisions. There had to be more of a love story. Things had to make sense. Sentences deemed strange and vague were questioned with “I really like this, but what does it mean?” The push for things to “make sense” has resulted in boring movies and boring books.

I also quickly understood I wasn’t going to have the full backing of a company so large, because they had celebrity memoirs and Nora Roberts. They had books with multimillion dollar investments. Shortly before my book was published there was little interest from reviewers and bookstores were hesitant to stock it – the presales numbers were too low. What little support I did have seemed to quickly drift away. My experience, when confessed to other writers published by a large publishing house, is often mirrored.

Here’s something Soderbergh says in his speech that should make every young filmmaker, writer, and artist, take notice: when questioning why his film Side Effects didn’t do well he comes up with the answer that there is no answer because everyone at the studio had already moved on to the next release. And when a film (or book) doesn’t do well, it’s not the studio (or publisher) who is truly affected, it’s the artist.

Books are released at high volume. The stress is on quantity not quality. There isn’t time to reflect, because the next product has to come out. Editors at the major publishing houses are swarmed on a daily basis with submissions (my former editor once told me she receives at least one novel from a reputable agent each day). How is there possibly enough time to thoughtfully read a truly ambitious and new piece of literature? Has anyone suggested slowing down? Has anyone suggested passing on the latest vampire thriller and maybe fully backing something truly different?

I understand Soderbergh has worn the hat of mainstream filmmaker and profited, but at heart, he’s an artist who worries about highly creative and challenging work disappearing entirely from the culture. He’s worried because the type of work he supports (example: Shane Carruth) he believes makes us better, more compassionate people. The effects of a culture feasting on Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and Fifty Shades of Grey may be difficult to gauge, but look at the physical characteristics of our society consuming cheap meat, fast food, and pizza.

In the beginning of his speech Soderbergh describes being on a plane and seeing a man watching a compilation of fight sequences, skipping over all dialogue and narrative. I can easily envision a future where readers download in one easy-to-read file all the juicy tidbits from the memoirs of Kim Kardashian, Justin Bieber, and Taylor Swift.

Big film studios like big book publishers will continue to release what sells. That makes sense. This is a business after all and people don’t have the time to research new films and books. But some responsibility of what we consume when it comes to movies and books should rest on the shoulders of those releasing it. This is what Soderbergh ultimately wants and is getting at in his speech: for the big studios to financially support (long term) and release work with artistic merit so a larger public will see it.

A few days ago I ate lunch outside the building I work in. This time of year the streets are lined with food vendors and the park is scattered with people. I sat on a stone ledge overlooking a grassy lawn next to a middle aged woman reading a neon yellow hardcover. After I asked what book she was reading, I decided to push a little further. I asked what made her buy that book. Her answer: it was on the front table of the store.

– – –

Shane Jones is the author of several books. Crystal Eaters, a novel, will be published in 2014 by Two Dollar Radio.

Tags: , ,

the internet literature
magazine blog of
the future