9 Comments

1. July 9th, 2010 / 5:20 pm sp—

   Regarding (I think, it won’t let me see the questions anymore) question 4, where you ask: Is the quality of writing generally better coming from Independent Presses than Mainstream Presses?

   Yes and No don’t really cover where I stand, which is: it depends?

2. July 9th, 2010 / 5:21 pm dan—

   i put “no” for q3 since “sometimes” wasn’t an option.

3. July 9th, 2010 / 8:49 pm ZZZIPP—

   YES THAT’S AN ANNOYING QUESTION

4. July 9th, 2010 / 9:20 pm sp—

   Regarding (I think, it won’t let me see the questions anymore) question 4, where you ask: Is the quality of writing generally better coming from Independent Presses than Mainstream Presses?

   Yes and No don’t really cover where I stand, which is: it depends?

5. July 9th, 2010 / 9:21 pm dan—

   i put “no” for q3 since “sometimes” wasn’t an option.

6. July 9th, 2010 / 10:20 pm mike—

   Yeah, I call bullshit on that question as well (it’s number three). It’s just as stupid to blindly hate everything a given press (be it Knopf, Dalkey, Mud Luscious) publishes as it is to blindly love it. You of all people should know this — did Shane Jones’ book get any better or worse when Penguin published it?

7. July 10th, 2010 / 12:49 am ZZZIPP—

   YES THAT’S AN ANNOYING QUESTION

8. July 10th, 2010 / 2:20 am Michael—

   Yeah, I call bullshit on that question as well (it’s number three). It’s just as stupid to blindly hate everything a given press (be it Knopf, Dalkey, Mud Luscious) publishes as it is to blindly love it. You of all people should know this — did Shane Jones’ book get any better or worse when Penguin published it?

9. July 12th, 2010 / 1:52 pm HTMLGIANT / For What It’s Worth—

   […] were 127 respondents to my survey about publishing, but the free account at Survey Monkey limits results to 100 people. All the other […]