Random
Artist Temperaments
It is not just an artist’s work, but their personalities — inadvertent, performative, implied, affected, whatever — by which an overall narrative, or “personal brand,” of the artist is measured, which invariably informs how the art is perceived. Do likeable people make likeable art, and vice versa? Is it better to be an arrogant genius than a modest one? At what point is arrogance reasonable? One hates to reduce art-making to the two binaries presented, but this seems to be the case: What you think of yourself, and what others think of you. (Also, notice, for e.g., Eddie Vedder on the mediocre side. I am not saying he’s mediocre. I’m saying he’s almost a genius. Your head is comprised of grey matter; may it host a grey zone) — and this is all grossly subjective and was distractedly assembled while this contributor was at work, in a cast (broken hand, bike accident), with low blood sugar due to manorexic tendencies (no breakfast, salad for lunch), and I know there’s not enough women and minorities represented, and that this is all rather mainstream, so if you point that out, I’ll know that you didn’t finish reading this ¶. Cheers, to the people who touch us.
needs more women…
sorry. this is v interesting. kinda disagree on mia and morrissey
& giggles in re: mr. white hat of bonfires
Some of these don’t make sense.
Virginia Woolf thumbing her nose at Joyce does not seem modest. Although I’d also give much more credit to her genius than this.
Tupac being behind Minaj, Chingy, MIA, and Busta Rhymes on genius. I mean is equal to Usher wtf.
Sontag, Lauren Hill, and Prince aren’t arrogant? Still like them but that has never been said about them.
Beckett is only slightly a genius?
Drake more of a genius than Jay-Z, Lil Wayne, LL Cool J, and equal to Run DMC?
Cobain ahead of every musician? By god, The Beatles. Cobain himself is turning over in his grave.
Other than that this was cool to look at. Good concept. Other cool measurements could be marriages, drugs, sex, money.
[…] the purely subjective department: a video countdown of the year’s best movies. And charting artists’ temperaments in relation to their genius. NPR’s Planet Money makes a T-shirt, and what Consumerist learned […]
ah, the arrogant mediocrity of david lee roth.
This proves what I’ve been saying for years—that John Updike is the Marilyn Manson of lit.
on the “genius side” for the writers it’s like mostly maximalists (or, whatever, you know). like no “real” minimalist made it over there. not that i think they should, just noticing.
you probably should do this with only alive writers and then have the mediocres compete against the geniuses in trivial pursuit, the 100 yard dash, boggle, and a game of basketball with modified 8 ft hoops for “artists.”
looking back, i will concede that tupac is more genius than chingy. i plotted each artist intuitively, without comparing their relation to others, so were one to read it literally/linearly (i.e. who’s in front of whom) then we might find ‘problems,’ though the perception of objective discrepancies are impossible in a subjective context.
i’m not saying drake is more genius than lil wayne; i’m saying the latter is a lil putz who can’t freestyle. i saw him trying to freestyle on TRL (via youtube) and all he did was recite existing lyrics.
i went to iffy lube and rotated my tired. i read infinite jest. i’m not saying DFW is the second most genius writer ‘of all times,’ only in the small sampling
Nice!!!
‘wholeheartedly’ agree with eminem’s placement
My brain said “bullshit” when I first saw where he was placed. But after 15 seconds I was on board.
i would add whitman, death grips, and jay reatard, on a locus from genius to modesty
also the shaggs should clearly occupy the bottom center of all three graphs
would like to see one of these featuring “alt lit,” “indie lit,” and other contemporary writers… Tao Lin, Blake Butler, Steve Roggenbuck, Jereme Dean, Gabby Bess, Marie Calloway, Penny Goring, Sam Pink, Matt Bell, Seth Abramson, etc, etc,….
this is completely preposterous someone take this down & ban jimmy chen from posting again
Wow. This one clears lots of things up for me. Yay for science!
jimmy did you start with the outliers when graphing
I assume each panel is on a different scale. After all, other than Biz Markie, I don’t think any of those hip-hop or rap artists could be considered “modest”.
I don’t think a “modest” artist would bother anyone else with their work; ‘to show’ entails ‘to arrogate’. Maybe a more disclosive polarity would be from ‘pompous/haughty’ to ‘diffident’.
Indeed. This thing is what finally killed Mandela.
For where Hunter S is alone, I know Chen is just pulling these data points out of his ass.
You put Franzen ahead of Thompson and McCarthy on the genius scale. I have no respect for your opinion.
i think the corrections is fantastic and i liked freedom a lot, but franzen more genius than burroughs etc.? nah
Modest Mouse isn’t a person
[…] Graph number 3 […]
Miles Davis, less of a genius than Syd Barrett. O…K
[…] dos ejes opuestos: mediocridad-genio y arrogancia-modestia. No le doy mucho crédito puesto que el sitio que lo ha publicado no explica los criterios por los que ha clasificado a cada autor en un lugar y no en […]
[…] Jimmy Chen in “Artistic Temperaments“ […]
[…] this list and had to […]
[…] goede muzikant is een combinatie van talent en karakter. Althans, dat stelt Jimmy Chen bij zijn data visualisaties van diverse artiesten uit allerhande genres. Maar waar wat is de gouden combinatie, waar trekken […]
This is stupid.I like Pearl Jam, but Eddie Vedder is no where near genius. Dylan and Morrissey are close though. Of the writers listed, only Faulkner truly comes close to genius, but there are many fine writers on the chart. But Updike wasn’t mediocre and Roth is not modest.
Wondering why Charles Bukowski didn’t merit his full name in the top graph? Seems odd.
Also, no Kurt Vonnegut?
Way to piss off everyone. This is amusing and severely subjective. You made something that we can all find strong disagreement with. I won’t get into the shit I disagree with, because I’m as wrong or right as everyone else here. Carry on.