November 18th, 2009 / 4:24 pm
Uncategorized

Conjunctions 53

conj53bis out now, the Hybrid Histories issue, and as always full of magic power. Among those: Andrew Ervin, Samuel Beckett, Thomas Bernhard, Robert Coover, William Gass, Tim Horvath, Peter Gizzi, Francise Prose, Paul La Farge.

Matt Bell’s incredible long story His Last Great Gift is also included, and can be read online here. It’s a brain eater, as we’ve come to expect on the regular from Mr. Bell.

Its first graph:

SPEAR HAS ALREADY BEEN living in the cabin overlooking High Rock for two weeks when the Electricizers speak of the New Motor for the first time. Awakened by their voices, Spear feels his way down the hallway from the dark and still unfamiliar bedroom to his small office. He lights a lamp and sits down at the desk. Scanning the press of ghastly faces around him, he sees they’re all here tonight: Jefferson and Rush and Franklin, plus his own namesake, John Murray. They wait impatiently for him to prepare his papers, to dip a pen in ink and shake it free of the excess. When he’s ready, they begin speaking, stopping occasionally to listen to other spirits that Spear can’t quite see, that he doesn’t yet have the skills to hear. These hidden spirits are far more ancient, and Spear intuits that they guide the Electricizers in the same way that the Electricizers guide him.

There aren’t that many magazines you can count on to be provocative and powerful from end to end most every time. Conjunctions is one of those. And you can subscribe for a year for $18 in the US. You will wish you had earlier, I can pretty much promise.

Tags: , , ,

33 Comments

  1. Josh Maday

      Amen to that, all around.

  2. Josh Maday

      Amen to that, all around.

  3. Kyle Minor

      That Matt Bell story alone is worth buying a copy to keep on your shelf.

  4. Kyle Minor

      That Matt Bell story alone is worth buying a copy to keep on your shelf.

  5. JonCone

      Great journal. I really do treasure Bradford’s rejections.

      From the grave, Beckett still amazes.

  6. Slick Watson

      If Bell’s story is what passes for smart, entertaining literature these days, then I give up. You would have to put a gun to my head to make me read that again. When did it become a prerequisite that everyone under the age of 35 who writes fiction has to set their stories in some vague dystopia where everyone, including the narrator, speaks in this stilted overly formal diction? I don’t get it. I chalk it up to self-imposed insulation from the world. Go take a walk or something. Jesus.

  7. Slick Watson

      If Bell’s story is what passes for smart, entertaining literature these days, then I give up. You would have to put a gun to my head to make me read that again. When did it become a prerequisite that everyone under the age of 35 who writes fiction has to set their stories in some vague dystopia where everyone, including the narrator, speaks in this stilted overly formal diction? I don’t get it. I chalk it up to self-imposed insulation from the world. Go take a walk or something. Jesus.

  8. Slick Watson

      T-Minus Ten until Butler deletes my comment.
      10
      9
      8
      7
      6
      5
      4
      3
      2
      1…

  9. Slick Watson

      T-Minus Ten until Butler deletes my comment.
      10
      9
      8
      7
      6
      5
      4
      3
      2
      1…

  10. alan rossi

      here’s my proposal: instead of writing your frustrations about this story in a quick comment on htmlgiant, why not critique it? this is a common thing, i think: sort of blind praise or blind trashing in comments sections, on blogs, sort of everywhere. i say this without having read this particular story. if you really think it’s got problems, why not try to figure out how the story is working, how it’s built, why this certain voice, language, peoples, trees, world, and then go at it. because, i mean, it doesn’t do much to just say this story is basically crap. it isn’t very interesting (same with blind praise). fuck, i keep saying ‘blind’ in front of everything.

  11. alan rossi

      here’s my proposal: instead of writing your frustrations about this story in a quick comment on htmlgiant, why not critique it? this is a common thing, i think: sort of blind praise or blind trashing in comments sections, on blogs, sort of everywhere. i say this without having read this particular story. if you really think it’s got problems, why not try to figure out how the story is working, how it’s built, why this certain voice, language, peoples, trees, world, and then go at it. because, i mean, it doesn’t do much to just say this story is basically crap. it isn’t very interesting (same with blind praise). fuck, i keep saying ‘blind’ in front of everything.

  12. joe

      slick watson, you sould submit to my journal. youre just the sort of dickhead whose stuff id like.

  13. joe

      slick watson, you sould submit to my journal. youre just the sort of dickhead whose stuff id like.

  14. Trey

      *any* credibility your first post might have had was eliminated by this juvenile display.

  15. Trey

      *any* credibility your first post might have had was eliminated by this juvenile display.

  16. CATHARTICA

      this story started off well but by midpoint it really started to ramble. the ending was disappointing; as the pages slipped away I kept thinking “How is she going to end this??” The author apparently was thinking the same thing; she just kind of cut it off abruptly with a final event that was about as satisfying as “and then I woke up and realized it was all a dream.”

  17. CATHARTICA

      this story started off well but by midpoint it really started to ramble. the ending was disappointing; as the pages slipped away I kept thinking “How is she going to end this??” The author apparently was thinking the same thing; she just kind of cut it off abruptly with a final event that was about as satisfying as “and then I woke up and realized it was all a dream.”

  18. Ryan Call

      what story are you talking about?

  19. Ryan Call

      what story are you talking about?

  20. blake

      by all means, give up.

  21. blake

      by all means, give up.

  22. blake

      i wouldnt let your ignorance shrine get hid, don’t worry dear.

  23. blake

      i wouldnt let your ignorance shrine get hid, don’t worry dear.

  24. JW Veldhoen

      Dude says his name is Slick Watson and he’s casting shade about something being “overly formal”?

  25. JW Veldhoen

      Dude says his name is Slick Watson and he’s casting shade about something being “overly formal”?

  26. Blake Butler

      he’s this guy who has been posting snarky comments on here for a long while. changes his name every so often. you might remember him as ‘milk and cookies’? or ‘maurice’? weak.

  27. Blake Butler

      he’s this guy who has been posting snarky comments on here for a long while. changes his name every so often. you might remember him as ‘milk and cookies’? or ‘maurice’? weak.

  28. Vaughan Simons

      It’s great to see fresh young talent like Sam Beckett getting his work in front of a wider audience. :)

  29. Vaughan Simons

      It’s great to see fresh young talent like Sam Beckett getting his work in front of a wider audience. :)

  30. Mather Schneider

      it’s called “flash-crit”…get with the program.

  31. Mather Schneider

      it’s called “flash-crit”…get with the program.

  32. george splittorf

      ignorance shrine – ha ha

  33. george splittorf

      ignorance shrine – ha ha