November 5th, 2009 / 8:03 pm
Snippets
—

The 15 Most Expensive Paintings in the World seems more interesting than The 50 Sluttiest American Apparel Ads of All Time. But that’s just, like, my opinion, man.

46 Comments

  1. gena—

      only 50 sluttiest?

  2. gena—

      only 50 sluttiest?

  3. mimi—

      Lebowski vernacular appears to be emerging as the parlance of this site.

  4. mimi—

      Lebowski vernacular appears to be emerging as the parlance of this site.

  5. jereme—

      i used to have a framed print of the “irises” picture in my house. i think my ex-wife has that now.

      i miss it.

  6. jereme—

      i used to have a framed print of the “irises” picture in my house. i think my ex-wife has that now.

      i miss it.

  7. jereme—

      painting, sorry, not a picture.

      my bad. not cultured and used to big words like “paintings”.

  8. jereme—

      painting, sorry, not a picture.

      my bad. not cultured and used to big words like “paintings”.

  9. mimi—

      *in* not *as*, rather

  10. mimi—

      *in* not *as*, rather

  11. Ken Baumann—

      i’d get up on that bacon, or the rubens.

      the pollock at number 1 is the biggest emotional $ fallacy around.

  12. Ken Baumann—

      i’d get up on that bacon, or the rubens.

      the pollock at number 1 is the biggest emotional $ fallacy around.

  13. Ken Baumann—

      that said: i’m happy it exists, and the price too

  14. jereme—

      word.

  15. Ken Baumann—

      that said: i’m happy it exists, and the price too

  16. jereme—

      word.

  17. Jones McJerk—

      who needs pollock when you’ve goat american apparel ads?

      did a dribble, dribble all my own.

  18. Jones McJerk—

      who needs pollock when you’ve goat american apparel ads?

      did a dribble, dribble all my own.

  19. Janey Smith—

      Um, interesting? Really? Seems more interesting?

      Let’s see: teenage girls, like, really high, showing their pussies and saying “oh, please, fuck me” to the camera guy or daubs of paint splattered on cardboard of some dude’s face or whatever selling for all kinds of money because Sonic Youth record sales are down.

      Hm. I don’t know. But, I’m slowly inching towards the pussy-shots–as more “interesting.”

      What’s revealing, however, is just how much money both the paintings and the pictures generate. Remember: you too can be a star (as long as you have money or are close to money)!

      Jones McJerk? Reveal yourself. You are funny!

  20. Janey Smith—

      Um, interesting? Really? Seems more interesting?

      Let’s see: teenage girls, like, really high, showing their pussies and saying “oh, please, fuck me” to the camera guy or daubs of paint splattered on cardboard of some dude’s face or whatever selling for all kinds of money because Sonic Youth record sales are down.

      Hm. I don’t know. But, I’m slowly inching towards the pussy-shots–as more “interesting.”

      What’s revealing, however, is just how much money both the paintings and the pictures generate. Remember: you too can be a star (as long as you have money or are close to money)!

      Jones McJerk? Reveal yourself. You are funny!

  21. Justin Taylor—

      I’m with Janey on this one.

  22. Justin Taylor—

      I’m with Janey on this one.

  23. thomas p levy—

      i like it

  24. thomas p levy—

      i like it

  25. damon—

      which set is more interesting after um.. jouissance.. i think is the point.

      I’ll side with the expressivists then (at least for an hour or two).

  26. damon—

      which set is more interesting after um.. jouissance.. i think is the point.

      I’ll side with the expressivists then (at least for an hour or two).

  27. james yeh—

      “goat american apparel ads”

  28. james yeh—

      “goat american apparel ads”

  29. sasha fletcher—

      fuck them for saying they were scratching their heads about the johns piece being up there.
      i’m going to try to come up with something to actually say about this at some point, but for now, fuck them. that was infuriating to me.

  30. sasha fletcher—

      fuck them for saying they were scratching their heads about the johns piece being up there.
      i’m going to try to come up with something to actually say about this at some point, but for now, fuck them. that was infuriating to me.

  31. sasha fletcher—

      why in the world is it the biggest emotional fallacy around?
      back this up baumann.

  32. sasha fletcher—

      why in the world is it the biggest emotional fallacy around?
      back this up baumann.

  33. sasha fletcher—

      sorry: emotionaly $ fallacy
      ain’t bein facetious with the retyping with $

  34. sasha fletcher—

      sorry: emotionaly $ fallacy
      ain’t bein facetious with the retyping with $

  35. daniel bailey—

      yo, picasso, wud up.

  36. daniel bailey—

      yo, picasso, wud up.

  37. daniel bailey—

      yer mom is infuriating to me

  38. daniel bailey—

      yer mom is infuriating to me

  39. sasha fletcher—

      yeah, but fr entirely different reasons.

  40. daniel bailey—

      those ads are the main ones that put out, in comparison to all american apparel ads. i did it with at least 6 of the advertisements. which suggests that maybe the list is a good list.

  41. sasha fletcher—

      yeah, but fr entirely different reasons.

  42. daniel bailey—

      those ads are the main ones that put out, in comparison to all american apparel ads. i did it with at least 6 of the advertisements. which suggests that maybe the list is a good list.

  43. daniel bailey—

      i like the idea that the advertisements themselves are slutty instead of the images being characteristically slutty.

  44. daniel bailey—

      i like the idea that the advertisements themselves are slutty instead of the images being characteristically slutty.

  45. drew kalbach—

      i don’t understand ‘slutty’ in this context.

      are the ads having sex with multiple partners?

      they’re just images. pretty images too i think.

      but it is an interesting idea that images can be ‘slutty’ as opposed to simply pornographic.

      and plus i think it’s great that they have the balls to be so blatantly sexual. it’s almost to the point where the sex appeal doesn’t sell the clothes because it’s just so glaringly obvious that’s what they’re going for.

  46. drew kalbach—

      i don’t understand ‘slutty’ in this context.

      are the ads having sex with multiple partners?

      they’re just images. pretty images too i think.

      but it is an interesting idea that images can be ‘slutty’ as opposed to simply pornographic.

      and plus i think it’s great that they have the balls to be so blatantly sexual. it’s almost to the point where the sex appeal doesn’t sell the clothes because it’s just so glaringly obvious that’s what they’re going for.