9 Comments

1. January 26th, 2011 / 6:47 am Trey—

   thought/kind of hoped this was going to lead to nabokov ventriloquism. this is good too.

2. January 26th, 2011 / 7:37 am Ken Baumann—

   If that existed (why doesn’t that exist?), it would.

3. January 26th, 2011 / 5:32 pm Lincoln Michel—

   Stupid paywall!

4. January 26th, 2011 / 5:35 pm alan—

   link was worth it for the butterfly porn alone

5. January 26th, 2011 / 5:35 pm alan—

   link was worth it for the butterfly porn alone

6. January 26th, 2011 / 6:49 pm Ken Baumann—

   Don’t think you have to pay, just register.

7. January 26th, 2011 / 8:35 pm Lincoln Michel—

   but i’m laz

8. January 26th, 2011 / 9:57 pm sp—

   Rule 34…

9. January 27th, 2011 / 1:52 am deadgod—

   Yes, a brilliant intuition or deduction of a now-genetically-demonstrated adaptive radiation.

   But “transoceanic land-bridges” weren’t/aren’t the only theory competing with ‘the Bering land-bridge’ to explain how spores, seeds, shoots, insects, birds, and small land mammals could have crossed the Pacific (in either direction). When the first humans to reach (for example) Hawai’i got there, they found not (only) desert, but rather (mostly) jungle.