March 20th, 2011 / 11:44 pm
Snippets

15 Comments

  1. Jess Dutschmann—

      please let people poems
      they get upset if you dont let them

      :[

  2. deadgod—

      I just read poems at that site by Shaun Gannon, xTx, Ras. Mashramani, and Stacey Teague (in that order chronologically; respecting only the favoritism embedded in randomness). They were all good; that’s an unusually high ratio of ’15 good minutes : ehn : 15 minutes gone forever’ .

      Note: is “Let People Poem” a better moniker, the verb ‘to poem’ being a bare infinitive (in that construction)?

  3. Shannon Peil—

      just let them

  4. Adam Robinson—

      That is cool.

  5. DJ Berndt—

      this is a fun idea, I like where this is going.

  6. shaun gannon—

      and god said, let people poems

  7. shaun gannon—

      and god said, let people poems

  8. shaun gannon—

      it looks like people are posting more than once, so i think the plural works. you’re let more than one poem; OR, it’s referring to the readers, not the writers

      (also thanks~)

  9. deadgod—

      I was suggesting that “poems” was from the made-up verb ‘to poem’, going with the auxiliary “let” – like the “run” in ‘let John run’ or ‘let Mary and John run’ (where there’s no plural, or no difference between plural and singular, because “run” is a bare infinitive (or – I’m not sure – a remnant subjunctive)).

      ‘Allow people to poem’; ‘permit people to poem’; “Let People Poem”.

  10. 'Guillaume Morissette'—
  11. shaun gannon—

      ah i see

  12. Tummler—
  13. reynard—

      ‘harlequin renaissance’

  14. JAMES JOYCE IS HIGH—

      TRIPLE ENTENDRE! WORD, SCORE, ETC.

  15. Jess Dutschmann—

      feels so right