January 20th, 2010 / 5:24 pm
Snippets

Hey remember that time something happened about laughing at a poetry reading in New York? Me either. But Craig Santos Perez does. And he sees a connection between Laughter-gate ’09 and the death of flarf–except flarf isn’t actually dead, or something. The best thing about the Perez blog post and/or its comments section–wherein a bunch of smart, otherwise interesting people conspire to take all their (and your) time and energy and drown it in a bathtub of pointlessness–actually occurs in the very first sentence, where Perez links to Dan Hoy’s epic study of flarf from Jacket 29. But again, I stress that flarf isn’t the issue here–nothing is the issue here. There is no issue here. So don’t click the link and don’t read the post. Read Dan’s old essay. Or, if you’re desperately spoiling for a fight, have it about Emerson. That horrendous article that Ken linked to earlier has been drawing fire all day. Our own thread-regular Mather Schneider is tearing it up over there, and I’m on-record as well. No word from the piece’s authors. Yet.

4 Comments

  1. Matt Cozart

      In related news, Language poetry *doesn’t even exist*! Right?

  2. Matt Cozart

      In related news, Language poetry *doesn’t even exist*! Right?

  3. magick mike

      ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  4. magick mike

      ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh