January 21st, 2009 / 7:26 pm
Mean

My Issue with Issuu

Issuu’s slick yet invariably muffled interface aims to mimic the printed page with ‘animated page flipping’ and rendering the shadowed contours of a flayed open book/magazine. Such dramatic flourishes beg the question: what the fuck?

In order to actually read the words, one needs to zoom in, an experience likely to induce vertigo spells. The lightest tap on your cursor will throw your eye over a vast terrain of ‘zoomed in’ space to another part of the book, abandoning it from the context usually established by peripheral vision. (Imagine having your nose to a page then getting hit in the head with a force going 20 miles per hour.)

Issuu’s navigational cursor, unlike the more intuitive ‘hand grab’ employed by Google maps and Adobe reader, is ‘involuntary’ in the sense that it’s summoned by a roll-over instead of the more controlled right-click (there is an option to ‘hand grab,’ though it’s difficult to get to without said vertigo). In order to hit any button, one’s cursor must dangerously traverse the space in between, invoking a reading (or lack of) experience which feels like inebriation.

Compare this to Googlebooks, which translates the qualities of printed matter without the eagerness to stun. I’m not trying to get all Amish on anyone — Googlebooks I can deal with. Google, in all its forms, is in essence very utilitarian, and thus of permanent nature.

The internet, while becoming ‘more easy,’ is inadvertently becoming more difficult at once. Designers and coders are a different breed; like YouTube and facebook, nobody trusts the full evocative qualities – made infinite by its very constraints – of the written word. The irony, I think, is that Issuu actually glorifies the printed page – as if the subordinance of publishing online is somehow elevated in its full mimicry of the printed page.

Many writers I respect have been published via Issuu, and this is no commentary on their work. I simply see a day when a new generation of click-happy readers glaze over word-faithful sites like elimae, bearparade, and McSweeneys – in need of something flash-ier (pun intended). The words should be still. The moving parts should be in your mind.

Television killed reading, and the internet just might kill it all over again.

Tags: ,

27 Comments

  1. ravi

      Well said. As soon as I see Issuu I’m kind of put off. Still, Locus Novus is pretty f’ing cool.

  2. ravi

      Well said. As soon as I see Issuu I’m kind of put off. Still, Locus Novus is pretty f’ing cool.

  3. Shya

      I posted a comment to this effect a while back. I don’t like it. In the late 90s, there was a surge in Flash-heavy sites that were as difficult to navigate as they were “creative,” but after a while, people realized that content is king. The fewer obstacles between the reader and the content the better.

      Also, no one will ever stop reading elimae. Ever.

  4. Shya

      I posted a comment to this effect a while back. I don’t like it. In the late 90s, there was a surge in Flash-heavy sites that were as difficult to navigate as they were “creative,” but after a while, people realized that content is king. The fewer obstacles between the reader and the content the better.

      Also, no one will ever stop reading elimae. Ever.

  5. matthew simmons

      Speaking of which, Superbad still exists.

  6. matthew simmons

      Speaking of which, Superbad still exists.

  7. Jimmy Chen

      mmm…somebody likes Mondrian

  8. Jimmy Chen

      mmm…somebody likes Mondrian

  9. Jimmy Chen

      holy shit! superbad is awesome!

  10. Jimmy Chen

      holy shit! superbad is awesome!

  11. barry

      i liked issuu for like ten minutes. and then i stopped.

  12. barry

      i liked issuu for like ten minutes. and then i stopped.

  13. the scowl » Blog Archive » reading on reading: online magazines + paper camp

      […] HTML Giant, Jimmy Chen looks at Issuu’s method for displaying text, which — to these eyes — […]

  14. Martin Ferro-Thomsen

      Thanks for taking a look at Issuu. We really appreciate it.

      We agree completely that each content type should be displayed the best possible way. That’s why we have a Paper viewer (still beta). It’s ideal for reading text, without any fancy Flash interaction (in fact, it’s one of the few online viewers out there that can run entirely without Flash). Here’s an example:
      http://issuu.com/guardian/docs/guardianbookoffootball/1?mode=a_p (you get this view mode by clicking the View mode button in the Flash viewer).

      The Flash viewer is primarily for magazines and presentations. The zoom mode can be changed (also globally if you’re a member). Obviously we cannot make monitors larger than they are, and if you’re on a bigger monitor you shouldn’t have to zoom to read text (of course depending on the layout which we also can’t change).

      Finally, we’re continuing to improve our site. A quick look on our blog (http://blog.issuu.com) will hopefully show you that we try to push the boundaries of what might be the future of publishing. We are learning and improving our service step by step while listening to quality feedback such as yours!

      Once again thank you for your interest in Issuu.

      Martin, on behalf of the Issuu team

  15. Martin Ferro-Thomsen

      Thanks for taking a look at Issuu. We really appreciate it.

      We agree completely that each content type should be displayed the best possible way. That’s why we have a Paper viewer (still beta). It’s ideal for reading text, without any fancy Flash interaction (in fact, it’s one of the few online viewers out there that can run entirely without Flash). Here’s an example:
      http://issuu.com/guardian/docs/guardianbookoffootball/1?mode=a_p (you get this view mode by clicking the View mode button in the Flash viewer).

      The Flash viewer is primarily for magazines and presentations. The zoom mode can be changed (also globally if you’re a member). Obviously we cannot make monitors larger than they are, and if you’re on a bigger monitor you shouldn’t have to zoom to read text (of course depending on the layout which we also can’t change).

      Finally, we’re continuing to improve our site. A quick look on our blog (http://blog.issuu.com) will hopefully show you that we try to push the boundaries of what might be the future of publishing. We are learning and improving our service step by step while listening to quality feedback such as yours!

      Once again thank you for your interest in Issuu.

      Martin, on behalf of the Issuu team

  16. Gene Morgan

      I want to make a print magazine that is 11″ x 15′, so I can get that “feel good” internet scrolling vibe from it.

  17. Gene Morgan

      I want to make a print magazine that is 11″ x 15′, so I can get that “feel good” internet scrolling vibe from it.

  18. peter cole

      I agree, though issuu is a good way to share stuff. The animated page turns hurt my eyes. the zoom button is annoying, but there is a full screen button.

      Scribd.com has a better reading experience and the website itself is better than issuu.

  19. peter cole

      I agree, though issuu is a good way to share stuff. The animated page turns hurt my eyes. the zoom button is annoying, but there is a full screen button.

      Scribd.com has a better reading experience and the website itself is better than issuu.

  20. Ryan Call

      i like issuu

  21. Ryan Call

      i like issuu

  22. Ryan Call

      me too

  23. Ryan Call

      me too

  24. Ryan Call

      that picture scared me

  25. Ryan Call

      that picture scared me

  26. Michael

      scrib my crib

  27. Michael

      scrib my crib