My New Research Interest is Popular Literature
Contrary to what the critics tell us, popular fiction is not a swamp of barely literate escapism; popular fiction is composed of ancient myths newly reborn, telling and retelling a simple truth: ordinary people can do extraordinary things. Jack can plant a beanstalk that will provide endless food; a Tom Clancy character can successfully unravel a conspiracy that threatens the lives of millions. A knight can slay a dragon; a Stephen King character can defeat the massed forces of evil. Cinderella can attract the prince through her own innate decency rather than through family connections; a Nora Roberts heroine can, through her own strength, rise above a savagely unhappy past and bring happiness to herself and others.
—“Popular Fiction: Why We Read It, Why We Write It” by Ann Maxwell/Elizabeth Lowell
Zealot vs. Rattail
Apparently this is//all over//everywhere,
but I don’t have TV so I dunno nothing much.
We’ll Be Back Soon! Drink Pepsi Products!
Hi everyone, we’re about to go dark for the night. We’ll be a whole new HTMLGIANT (with new sponsors!) when we come back. In the meantime, why don’t you enjoy a refreshing Pepsi product?!
Two questions. When Witz came out, it felt like a lot of people were obsessed with the length of the book at 700 pages, as if the length were an insurmountable obstacle. Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom is about 570 pages long and way heavier because it is an infernal hardcover book, and yet I don’t hear a lot of chatter about the length of the book. Why is that? I hate hardcover books. When I say hate, I mean I react irrationally to them. Holding them makes me want to punch something. It’s uncomfortable especially because I am reading Freedom right now and it literally pains me to hold it. I should have Kindled it. Does anyone else hate hardcover books as much as I do?
tumblr, twitter, literature
Getting reblogged feels just like being published, is.
Logic dictates I create the literary equivalent of this.
Off-camera, Alfred Hitchcock says, “We’re gonna have chicken for dinner tonight.”
The posthuman is merely the subhuman that results whenever people aspire to the superhuman.
– Garret Keizer (On ‘postmen’ in this month’s Harper’s)
Dick Cavett: What psychology do you use on a seagull?
Hitchcock: Birdseed.
On the extent of my errors
Forever, I thought solipsism was one’s belief that she is the center of the universe. This seemed to be a logical definition to me, “sol” after all means “sun.” Also, someone who is solipsistic is egotistical, duh. I mean: my definition made sense. To me, at least.
I started this post with something profound to say.
I was going to say: Logic would tell us that solipsism derives from ego, the inflation of self to the point that one believes she is the center of the universe, planets rotating around her; however, solipsism comes from a deep sense of insecurity and nothing else.
But I was wrong. Solipsism is not the belief that one is the center of this galaxy. Solipsism does not equate self with the sun, a star. No, solipsism is “the view or theory that self is the only object of real knowledge or the only thing really existent” (OED). It’s etymology does not come from “sol” meaning “sun” but from “solus” meaning “alone,” easy mistake, sure.
Purple People
Which do you prefer: City, college town, or countryside?
I’ve always thought college towns would be ideal. Then, frosh week started and these purple people (literally, no metaphor at all) descended on my town. And reader: these are NOT the poor freshmen. That would be logical, maybe. No, these are the hazers. Needless to say, this place is a hazardly mess.
Some Pseudoscience: On Silence
I let myself live in silence sometimes