Random

ON BITTERNESS & HOW TO LIVE

good in Greenberg

This article about hipster darling Greta Gerwig made me think about the unfortunate and sometimes very talented actors and actresses I know who look very much like other breakout stars.  I went to school with an actress who looks like Greta Gerwig.  I wonder if Greta Gerwig’s success helps or hurts this other actress.  Probably the latter.  The guy who I’d consider the best actor I ever saw in Yale drama bears a strong resemblance to Johnny Depp.  He used to enjoy the comparison, I think, but not so much now, although he’s a working actor in L.A.  (Skeet Ulrich managed to get roles looking just like Depp.  There’s worse people you could resemble.) …And then that guy used to date Zoe Kazan, a suddenly ubiquitous actress who I think was a year or two behind me in school but who I didn’t know at all.  And I briefly dated an actress a few years behind Kazan who strongly resembles her (same looks, same education, no Hollywood royalty background–that kinda sucks) and (an older version of) Dakota Fanning.  I’d find that kind of vexing if I were in her situation.

But I guess I have been.  READ MORE >

Random / 32 Comments
March 29th, 2010 / 10:59 am

Some Thoughts on Evan Lavender-Smith’s From Old Notebooks


“The book is the subject and the object of the book.” (pg. 137)

“In a certain respect, [From Old Notebooks] represents little more than the garbage can of my imagination.” (pg. 75)
One afternoon I checked my facebook page and saw in the news feed thing a post by Evan Lavender-Smith, which included blurbs for his book From Old Notebooks. What struck me about the post was that instead of the blurbs being from other “creative” writers, they were from literary critics, and not just any literary critics, but some of the biggest names in Deleuze Studies: Claire Colebrook and Ian Buchanan, to name only two. Knowing nothing else about it, I automatically wanted to purchase the book and read it.

What follows are some thoughts, having finished it last night.

READ MORE >

Random / 27 Comments
March 28th, 2010 / 12:16 pm

drunk sonnet # 18

Damn, I thought this was going to be more dramatic, bit to re-shoot and all that is really not in the spirit of drunk sonnets. I’ll do another later. I am actually drunk. So sorry here. Some times with I could act more drunk when drunk, so sorry. But  i sure as hell shot this poem and will shoot another better later. I do believe is shooting poems, as do you. i keep hearing birds.

S

Random / 23 Comments
March 27th, 2010 / 11:49 pm

Friday Fuck Books, Let’s Have a Cheeseburger

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwRHGHNeOtI

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDJegk88lgw
READ MORE >

Random / 6 Comments
March 26th, 2010 / 8:23 pm

To Air is Human

Air

In 1987 Nike introduced the Nike Air brand, making billions of dollars selling air. A small pocket of air in one’s sole promises levity; this perhaps is even more genius than Coke selling carbonated sugar water. A year later in 1988, Metallica released …And Justice For All, and while air-guitar and air-drums had long since been funneled through the flailing limbs of certain hopeless yet hopeful youth, never before had one had to do it with such precision, a mark of that outstanding album. It has been argued that heavy metal shares many musical properties with classical music, in terms of difficult time signatures and syncopated patterns, so it is not a huge stretch to suggest that when a conductor waves his arms in the air in an exaggerated manner, he is doing the air-symphony. “Airing” is the self-promise of all the notes matching up, a fantasy of mastery we afford ourselves. Guitar Hero and Rock Band‘s commericalization of such intuition provides the nth death of punk.

READ MORE >

Random / 12 Comments
March 26th, 2010 / 2:41 pm

It is Friday: Go Right Ahead

Visit me! You can come unannounced, drunk, sober, or even leading a giraffe.

Rivers of gin and oysters.

Why did you tell that pretty girl, who was probably your sister, that I was drunk?

Muzzle a dog and he will bark out of the other end.

Instead of banning drink I will ban my limited sense of obligation.

The clouds once more bid me.

How drunk, or how drunkly sober under-drunk, can you calculate you are now?

Hurray for the wine-colored corduroy!

Sorry about last night. A sloth or mudlark would have probably been better.

No, I’m not drinking anymore. Only wine.

Random / 4 Comments
March 26th, 2010 / 12:17 pm

Book Pots

[recycled+pot+books-1.jpg]

What are the best book/plant combinations you can think of?

The Day of the Triffids is probably too easy.

(via NotCot)

Random / 20 Comments
March 26th, 2010 / 11:28 am

PLASTIC BAG WITH VOICE OF WERNER HERZOG

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDBtCb61Sd4

This is awesome. Seriously. Watch and be changed a little.

Random / 21 Comments
March 25th, 2010 / 6:01 am

@MoMa

Paola Antonelli of MoMa has written an short post dedicated to celebrating MoMa’s ‘acquiring’ the @ symbol into the collection. I didn’t know much about the @ symbol, so I thought it was a pretty good read. Here’s a bit for you:

The appropriation and reuse of a pre-existing, even ancient symbol—a symbol already available on the keyboard yet vastly underutilized, a ligature meant to resolve a functional issue (excessively long and convoluted programming language) brought on by a revolutionary technological innovation (the Internet)—is by all means an act of design of extraordinary elegance and economy. Without any need to redesign keyboards or discard old ones, [Ray] Tomlinson gave the @ symbol a completely new function that is nonetheless in keeping with its origins, with its penchant for building relationships between entities and establishing links based on objective and measurable rules—a characteristic echoed by the function @ now embodies in computer programming language. Tomlinson then sent an email about the @ sign and how it should be used in the future. He therefore consciously, and from the very start, established new rules and a new meaning for this symbol.

Random / 10 Comments
March 24th, 2010 / 2:26 pm

Mess Section


1. BUT NOTE:THE AUDIENCE WILL NOT TUNE IN TO WATCH INFORMATION. YOU WOULDN’T, I WOULDN’T. NO ONE WOULD OR WILL. THE AUDIENCE WILL ONLY TUNE IN AND STAY TUNED TO WATCH DRAMA. –from a letter from David Mamet to staff writers on The Unit

2. It is as though what Stein’s generation needed to do to make art was to find out for the first time what art was. In other words, the whole point of acknowledging the present for Stein is to disclose what, once laid bare, seems always to have existed. When this happens, art happens. Understood in this sense, the avant-garde isn’t just the struggle for its time. It’s the struggle in its time for something lost or forgotten or repressed by its time. Stein’s term, both for this struggle and for its object, is “a continuous present.” –from an essay by R.M. Berry

3. ‘I’m not a genius. Sloppy? Perhaps. It’s like this: When I am feeling good, I train a lot. When I feel bad, I don’t bother. I don’t enjoy working to a timetable. Systematic learning would kill me.’ –from an interview with Magnus Carlsen, 19 years old, world’s #1 ranked chess player

4. A dose.

Random / 12 Comments
March 24th, 2010 / 10:30 am