September 24th, 2009 / 7:47 pm
Random
Ken Baumann
Random
-
Archives
- January 2023
- February 2022
- September 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
-
Meta
No, they don’t. When I want that, I look at that. But most of the time I just want words. The pedantry of the image annoys me; I’m sick of being “shown.”
No, they don’t. When I want that, I look at that. But most of the time I just want words. The pedantry of the image annoys me; I’m sick of being “shown.”
Words that can remap the representational space at the end of each sentence? Challenge is on.
Words that can remap the representational space at the end of each sentence? Challenge is on.
Yeah. I don’t feel a need to compete with this
Yeah. I don’t feel a need to compete with this
I was thinking that videos like these compete for attention, but language is messy and your interpretation and reaction and annoyance make me smile–not happy–but it does make me smile.
Why?
I was thinking that videos like these compete for attention, but language is messy and your interpretation and reaction and annoyance make me smile–not happy–but it does make me smile.
Why?
Because it is a graphic representation ( a fairly good one, but honestly not deeply moving or anything) and I would rather compete with things that play with language and ideas. I want to compete with DFW or Pynchon or Baumann even. If I were a film maker or a performance artists I might need to compete with this, but I’m a writer. so
Because it is a graphic representation ( a fairly good one, but honestly not deeply moving or anything) and I would rather compete with things that play with language and ideas. I want to compete with DFW or Pynchon or Baumann even. If I were a film maker or a performance artists I might need to compete with this, but I’m a writer. so
But I’m annoyed in language, not on film.
But I’m annoyed in language, not on film.
Oh. For attention. Then You are right. My words also compete with Desperate Housewives and Dancing with the Stars.
Oh. For attention. Then You are right. My words also compete with Desperate Housewives and Dancing with the Stars.
I thoroughly dug that
I thoroughly dug that
i think that ken’s sentiment, that your words should be worthy of someone’s attention as there are countless other inputs out there, is always a good thing to be reminded.
i think that ken’s sentiment, that your words should be worthy of someone’s attention as there are countless other inputs out there, is always a good thing to be reminded.
so sweet
so sweet
True.
Mine was that writing can get away with being artifice. Thus, “turn of phrase”
I prefer not to think of competition of attention, since large amts. of present attention don’t always age well.
True.
Mine was that writing can get away with being artifice. Thus, “turn of phrase”
I prefer not to think of competition of attention, since large amts. of present attention don’t always age well.
that was brilliant and took a lot of work. i feel like a slacker now.
that was brilliant and took a lot of work. i feel like a slacker now.
wow ( not world of warcraft wow, but holy shit wow).
wow ( not world of warcraft wow, but holy shit wow).
amazing, but did it have to repeat half way through?
amazing, but did it have to repeat half way through?
I think it would have been suspicious to just repeat the beginning, beginning the second cycle. Agreed, amazing and unexpected.
The average video watched on YouTube gets about 10 seconds of attention, right? That this would get 4 minutes (8 if watched through the repeat) makes this the YouTube equivalent of Infinite Jest in terms of length.
I think it would have been suspicious to just repeat the beginning, beginning the second cycle. Agreed, amazing and unexpected.
The average video watched on YouTube gets about 10 seconds of attention, right? That this would get 4 minutes (8 if watched through the repeat) makes this the YouTube equivalent of Infinite Jest in terms of length.
whoa, cool. like 3-d Kentridge. No need to compete if you can make words do that too.
whoa, cool. like 3-d Kentridge. No need to compete if you can make words do that too.
Coincidentally, I posted the same video to Metafilter yesterday (http://bit.ly/JjueK). I liked this comment by one viewer: “I enjoyed the way the animators were constantly visible at work. I am an admirer of the kind of Brechtian usage of cinematic effects, where the effect does not need to fool you in order to be beautiful.”
I don’t know if these words can compete with this truly superb animation, but you have to see the relative value of everything. The first comment read, “Cool. It does a loop (repeat) halfway through.”
Coincidentally, I posted the same video to Metafilter yesterday (http://bit.ly/JjueK). I liked this comment by one viewer: “I enjoyed the way the animators were constantly visible at work. I am an admirer of the kind of Brechtian usage of cinematic effects, where the effect does not need to fool you in order to be beautiful.”
I don’t know if these words can compete with this truly superb animation, but you have to see the relative value of everything. The first comment read, “Cool. It does a loop (repeat) halfway through.”