don’t know if it’s ‘possible’ to ‘love’ someone i’ve never met, but i definitely feel ‘strong positive feelings’ re Tao and feel ‘considerably inspired’ and ‘vitalized’ by his existence/writing/art/activities.
don’t know if it’s ‘possible’ to ‘love’ someone i’ve never met, but i definitely feel ‘strong positive feelings’ re Tao and feel ‘considerably inspired’ and ‘vitalized’ by his existence/writing/art/activities.
@tadd & stephen i’ll be the first to flag myself as senseless iconoclastic, but can you help me see what you mean by love here? could you qualify specifically, precisely what’s at play here that is worthy of love? could you help the rest of us try to understand better, what exactly it is we’re getting wrong?
i already know he’s gay.
tao lin
classic jereme
classic marshall
“i havent read this yet but i want to be the first to ask how long is your penis”
~5″ erect
i guess some things are worth repeating: ‘lite‘rature
It’s going to be alright Captain Picard.
i already know he’s gay.
tao lin
classic jereme
classic marshall
It’s going to be alright Captain Picard.
y’all be haters. i love that kid.
y’all be haters. i love that kid.
This is probably pretty important. We might look back on this and say, “I commented that day.”
don’t know if it’s ‘possible’ to ‘love’ someone i’ve never met, but i definitely feel ‘strong positive feelings’ re Tao and feel ‘considerably inspired’ and ‘vitalized’ by his existence/writing/art/activities.
if he was doing this at the MoMA you might feel different about it. give it 10-15 years.
hehe… “Tao is Present.” hehe…
This is probably pretty important. We might look back on this and say, “I commented that day.”
don’t know if it’s ‘possible’ to ‘love’ someone i’ve never met, but i definitely feel ‘strong positive feelings’ re Tao and feel ‘considerably inspired’ and ‘vitalized’ by his existence/writing/art/activities.
if he was doing this at the MoMA you might feel different about it. give it 10-15 years.
hehe… “Tao is Present.” hehe…
@tadd & stephen i’ll be the first to flag myself as senseless iconoclastic, but can you help me see what you mean by love here? could you qualify specifically, precisely what’s at play here that is worthy of love? could you help the rest of us try to understand better, what exactly it is we’re getting wrong?