Craft Notes
Writing Prompt: You’re Wrong, Emily Dickinson!
Music For Real Airports from The Black Dog on Vimeo.
An electronic group called The Black Dog thinks that Brian Eno got it wrong. So they have tried to rectify the problem.
In 1978, Brian Eno released an album called Music for Airports. It’s a classic, a sacred cow of ambient music, written by the man who coined the term for the genre. It’s also meant to be used by airports, intended to be played to help release the tensions of travel.
That doesn’t sit right with The Black Dog. They have responded with Music for Real Airports. From their press release: “”Airports have some of the glossiest surfaces in modern culture, but the fear underneath remains. Hence this record is not a utilitarian accompaniment to airports, in the sense of reinforcing the false utopia and fake idealism of air travel. Unlike Eno’s Music For Airports, this is not a record to be used by airport authorities to lull their customers.”
Here’s a task. Take a classic piece of writing. Decide what you think it intends to do. (A famous—and very simple—example: Candide intends to satirize Gottfried Leibniz’s optimism, that we live in the best of all possible worlds*.) Disagree with that. Even if you agree with it, find a way to disagree with it. Embrace the contrarian within.
Not the most original prompt, I admit. But a slight twist on it, I hope.
* And, yes. Voltaire misunderstood Leibniz.
Tags: brian eno, music for real airports, Writing prompts
oh hell yeah.
Thanks! Go disagree with someone.
considering sneaking ginny woolf into a poem now.
oh hell yeah.
Thanks! Go disagree with someone.
considering sneaking ginny woolf into a poem now.
First, Eno wasn’t in some sick cahoots, trying to anesthetize air travelers out of their discomfort and horror-realities. But these people sort of imply that, no (the phrase ‘airport authorities’ seems passive aggressive)? Airports–for eno– was just a site specific work; as intense as it is, there’s a frivolity to it that implies it’s sort of just a thing he thought of in the moment he thought of it, and then he followed through with it. It was original, absurd, and above all, beautiful music. This, however, is just bad derivative bullshit. But it definitely is music for real airports: this could be an ad for Virgin America, without a doubt; it’s practically the same color scheme already. And I’m sure if Virgin *did* offer them a hefty sum to use their music or play this video, they’ll said no. As fucking if.
I’m bored.
Apparently.
First, Eno wasn’t in some sick cahoots, trying to anesthetize air travelers out of their discomfort and horror-realities. But these people sort of imply that, no (the phrase ‘airport authorities’ seems passive aggressive)? Airports–for eno– was just a site specific work; as intense as it is, there’s a frivolity to it that implies it’s sort of just a thing he thought of in the moment he thought of it, and then he followed through with it. It was original, absurd, and above all, beautiful music. This, however, is just bad derivative bullshit. But it definitely is music for real airports: this could be an ad for Virgin America, without a doubt; it’s practically the same color scheme already. And I’m sure if Virgin *did* offer them a hefty sum to use their music or play this video, they’ll said no. As fucking if.
I’m bored.
Apparently.