I enjoyed, for example, the way the two stories in Mulholland Drive tunneled into each other, and I thought, of that aspect of that movie, that leaving the, what, peculiarity of it ‘open’ was effective, because exegesis would’ve marred the story of the stories, as it were.
But I feel that – or at least wonder if – he’s being weird for the sake of it, that he tries to be ‘weird’. Blech. —not that he fails to gratify a craving for neatness, but rather, that his effects are, for me, diffused by the very energy of their disposition.
(Remember all the blah-blah in Stalker? that gets you – or me, anyway – not much purchase on or even intimacy with understanding “the Zone”? That morose, chatting-with-the-kitchen-table explication was perfectly weird.)
Really enjoy the tunneling as well. I don’t get the feeling that Lynch ever tries for weirdness–the situations seem too naturally, unavoidably weird, if that makes sense. I also think the refusal to explain is crucial.
Yeah. I watched a Lynch movie because my sister brought it home. I didn’t get it. And then felt (or rather attempted to be made to feel) stoopid because, not that I didn’t get it, but that I didn’t get it because I was engineered to like a particular type of movie. Whatever. I still don’t dig his shit. But, each, own, their.
Is this from his new Nickelodeon show?
The worst thing to do with music is to show the lyrics being acted out.
Really? I think it totally works for this song.
not safe for work but I don’t know where ukeleles wander?
Are You Afraid of the Wild & Crazy Kids?
…who unsods what
so tired of tits
so tired of art
I don’t mean to be strategically obtuse, but why do people think Lynch is artful?
This video, for example. It’s trippy, with the football player and burning mohawk and pretty girl (??) with the scribbling on her chest and all.
Is an accumulation of ‘trippy’ it?
so tired of tarts
I like / love his movies and the music is fine but this video is terrible.
It’s like he dubbed over a Soundgarden video from 1996.
this (music) video is not the best example of Lynch’s art. have you seen his films?
so tired of Lynch’s asexual dick, which we can only assume is “in there somewhere” but might actually be a second face.
it’s hiding in the dumpster behind winkies ;-)
I enjoyed, for example, the way the two stories in Mulholland Drive tunneled into each other, and I thought, of that aspect of that movie, that leaving the, what, peculiarity of it ‘open’ was effective, because exegesis would’ve marred the story of the stories, as it were.
But I feel that – or at least wonder if – he’s being weird for the sake of it, that he tries to be ‘weird’. Blech. —not that he fails to gratify a craving for neatness, but rather, that his effects are, for me, diffused by the very energy of their disposition.
(Remember all the blah-blah in Stalker? that gets you – or me, anyway – not much purchase on or even intimacy with understanding “the Zone”? That morose, chatting-with-the-kitchen-table explication was perfectly weird.)
Really enjoy the tunneling as well. I don’t get the feeling that Lynch ever tries for weirdness–the situations seem too naturally, unavoidably weird, if that makes sense. I also think the refusal to explain is crucial.
Tarkovsky++
i feel ya ponsford
not safe for work because i don’t know where u work, duh.
I think this video is a fantastic example of Lynch’s art. It’s like a trailer for the parts of Wild at Heart that never got made.
Yeah. I watched a Lynch movie because my sister brought it home. I didn’t get it. And then felt (or rather attempted to be made to feel) stoopid because, not that I didn’t get it, but that I didn’t get it because I was engineered to like a particular type of movie. Whatever. I still don’t dig his shit. But, each, own, their.
Granted, I was 13…
viptoshopper.com
it totally works: http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/eab2a63415/loser-literal-video-version
I like this song and I feel like this song likes me too.