May 6th, 2010 / 11:07 am
Random

Bathroom Poetics

I was at my favorite bar the other night watching some NBA playoffs when the bathroom called to me. I found this:

I think it takes some real balls to 1. claim to be God and 2. claim a space in the Smokin’ Joe’s unisex bathroom to stake your Godness claim. Or maybe some drunkard had a supernatural experience in which God visited said bathroom and said drunkard simply wanted to share it with the world. Whatever. Bathroom poetics.

Tags: ,

20 Comments

  1. Justin Taylor—

      Homer: “This isn’t about Jesus, is it?”
      Reverend Lovejoy: “All things are about Jesus, Homer.” [beat] “Except this.”

  2. alexis—

      All things should trace back to Homer and Reverend Lovejoy.

  3. Schulyer Prinz—

      is it not theologically impossible for God to have ‘been’ somewhere? I thought he could only exist in the present perfect tense, or not at all.

  4. Schulyer Prinz—

      Poor pronoun choice in the second sentence. I apologize for that.

  5. alexis—

      Isn’t there some sort of “God is-was-will be” language somewhere in the by-laws? I’m told he/she/it pops in for visits here and there, usually with the aid of psychedelics.

  6. Schulyer Prinz—

      Speaking in the, uh, purely hypothetical (of course), I believe it to be more of a recognizing of the ever-presence of God rather than God’s sudden appearance in an unlikely spot. That is to say, when tripping balls in a bathroom, I am more likely to feel (or see, or taste) God seeping out of the walls and twisting the graffiti all around me into unspeakable words, and less likely catch sight of a fleeting demi-zeus out of the corner of my eye. Or something like that.

  7. franco—

      yeah, much more interesting to look at this phrase in temporal terms and notice the implied conclusion: “god is no longer here.”

  8. Justin Taylor—

      Homer: “This isn’t about Jesus, is it?”
      Reverend Lovejoy: “All things are about Jesus, Homer.” [beat] “Except this.”

  9. alexis—

      All things should trace back to Homer and Reverend Lovejoy.

  10. Schulyer Prinz—

      is it not theologically impossible for God to have ‘been’ somewhere? I thought he could only exist in the present perfect tense, or not at all.

  11. Schulyer Prinz—

      Poor pronoun choice in the second sentence. I apologize for that.

  12. alexis—

      Isn’t there some sort of “God is-was-will be” language somewhere in the by-laws? I’m told he/she/it pops in for visits here and there, usually with the aid of psychedelics.

  13. Sean—

      He went caps G and we are made in his image (whatever that means) so I think a bar bathroom is a fine place for God to appear.

      First miracle was water to tea? Uh, no…

      WINE.

      Take note. That’s called priorities.

  14. Schulyer Prinz—

      Speaking in the, uh, purely hypothetical (of course), I believe it to be more of a recognizing of the ever-presence of God rather than God’s sudden appearance in an unlikely spot. That is to say, when tripping balls in a bathroom, I am more likely to feel (or see, or taste) God seeping out of the walls and twisting the graffiti all around me into unspeakable words, and less likely catch sight of a fleeting demi-zeus out of the corner of my eye. Or something like that.

  15. franco—

      yeah, much more interesting to look at this phrase in temporal terms and notice the implied conclusion: “god is no longer here.”

  16. Sean—

      He went caps G and we are made in his image (whatever that means) so I think a bar bathroom is a fine place for God to appear.

      First miracle was water to tea? Uh, no…

      WINE.

      Take note. That’s called priorities.

  17. isaac estep—

      this one time i was peeing in a bathroom and

  18. isaac estep—

      this one time i was peeing in a bathroom and

  19. ce.—

      you win this thread, franco.

  20. ce.—

      you win this thread, franco.