June 5th, 2009 / 10:49 am
Web Hype

NEW HTMLGIANT

mwork

The new site will go live this weekend, unless my wife has a baby.

If you have any observations or criticism in regards to the new site (and give me a little while to get it all working), please flame me in this post.

Love you guys, and I hope my small changes improve your overall HTMLGIANT experience.

117 Comments

  1. André—

      I think I might have liked the plain-text header better. But the rest of the site definitely looks less “bland”.

  2. André—

      I think I might have liked the plain-text header better. But the rest of the site definitely looks less “bland”.

  3. sasha fletcher—

      gene, i liked the old sidebars, with the links to contributors and the instant searching of posts by topic
      but i think the new header and footer are slammin.

  4. sasha fletcher—

      gene, i liked the old sidebars, with the links to contributors and the instant searching of posts by topic
      but i think the new header and footer are slammin.

  5. Gene Morgan—

      There will be a contributor page soon.

  6. Gene Morgan—

      There will be a contributor page soon.

  7. kirby—

      the new html giant is sexy. i feel like i could be in a club but instead im at work in a sequin tube top.

  8. kirby—

      the new html giant is sexy. i feel like i could be in a club but instead im at work in a sequin tube top.

  9. ryan—

      woah!

  10. ryan—

      woah!

  11. Rachel—

      Don’t we all get our fix in Google Reader anyway?

  12. Rachel—

      Don’t we all get our fix in Google Reader anyway?

  13. blake—

      fuck yes dad

  14. blake—

      fuck yes dad

  15. Gene Morgan—

      You should. You can also stay current on Twitter now. Updates will post there when they are posted here.

  16. Gene Morgan—

      You should. You can also stay current on Twitter now. Updates will post there when they are posted here.

  17. Lincoln—

      :-o

  18. Lincoln—

      :-o

  19. Lincoln—

      That was not the emoticon I wished to convey…

  20. Gene Morgan—

      sorry

  21. Lincoln—

      That was not the emoticon I wished to convey…

  22. Gene Morgan—

      sorry

  23. Vaughan Simons—

      I love the logo. I want to put on a flared white suit, get myself a cheap and tawdry cocktail, and disco dance the night away. (Or at least I would, if I didn’t only have one leg.)

  24. Vaughan Simons—

      I love the logo. I want to put on a flared white suit, get myself a cheap and tawdry cocktail, and disco dance the night away. (Or at least I would, if I didn’t only have one leg.)

  25. Gene Morgan—

      I turned the emoticon display thing off.

  26. Gene Morgan—

      I turned the emoticon display thing off.

  27. Red—

      Can you add script that automatically triggers the sound of a thunderous a-bomb explosion heard behind an elderly man screaming “YESS!! YES!! YEESS!! YEEESSS!! YESSS!! NOOO!! NOO!! YEESSSS!! YEESSS!! NNO!! YEESSSSS!!” every time you open one of Jimmy Chen’s posts?

      I think it would introduce the appropriate amount of depth / awesomeness one needs to adjust for when confronting his work.

      I’m not being sarcastic.

  28. Red—

      Can you add script that automatically triggers the sound of a thunderous a-bomb explosion heard behind an elderly man screaming “YESS!! YES!! YEESS!! YEEESSS!! YESSS!! NOOO!! NOO!! YEESSSS!! YEESSS!! NNO!! YEESSSSS!!” every time you open one of Jimmy Chen’s posts?

      I think it would introduce the appropriate amount of depth / awesomeness one needs to adjust for when confronting his work.

      I’m not being sarcastic.

  29. Gene Morgan—

      I’ll look for a plugin.

  30. Gene Morgan—

      I’ll look for a plugin.

  31. sasha fletcher—

      nice.

  32. sasha fletcher—

      nice.

  33. Ken Baumann—

      Rad.

  34. Ken Baumann—

      Agreed.

  35. Ken Baumann—

      Rad.

  36. Ken Baumann—

      Agreed.

  37. Shane Jones—

      Looks great.

  38. Shane Jones—

      Looks great.

  39. Gene Morgan—

      Sorry for spamming you with email last week.

  40. Gene Morgan—

      Sorry for spamming you with email last week.

  41. cobweb—

      it’s very nice!

      my favourite part is how the descriptive blurb is 3 inches to the right of it’s previous location, thus allowing for instant unbridled access to the most recent post.

      not sure if I like the black background though. it reveals a thick frosting of dust which clings to my screen.of which I was previous unaware.

      also not sure about the “most recent comments” section. I see it on other sites a lot but find it to be pretty much useless. I think that a better/similar section for the space would be “most popular [responded to] comments” or something like that.

  42. cobweb—

      it’s very nice!

      my favourite part is how the descriptive blurb is 3 inches to the right of it’s previous location, thus allowing for instant unbridled access to the most recent post.

      not sure if I like the black background though. it reveals a thick frosting of dust which clings to my screen.of which I was previous unaware.

      also not sure about the “most recent comments” section. I see it on other sites a lot but find it to be pretty much useless. I think that a better/similar section for the space would be “most popular [responded to] comments” or something like that.

  43. cobweb—

      or on second thought, maybe a revolving ‘jimmy chen head’ GIF could go there.

  44. cobweb—

      or on second thought, maybe a revolving ‘jimmy chen head’ GIF could go there.

  45. drew—

      i like starry words, good work

  46. drew—

      i like starry words, good work

  47. Brad Green—

      All the new posts in my Google Reader say title unknown. I’m not certain what impact this will have on my life yet.

  48. Brad Green—

      All the new posts in my Google Reader say title unknown. I’m not certain what impact this will have on my life yet.

  49. Jimmy Chen—

      i don’t understand all the jimmy chen references lately. i’m beginning to suspect some sarcasm, no?

  50. Jimmy Chen—

      i don’t understand all the jimmy chen references lately. i’m beginning to suspect some sarcasm, no?

  51. Jimmy Chen—

      dang, thanks. i just replied to cobweb thinking he was sarcastic

  52. Jimmy Chen—

      dang, thanks. i just replied to cobweb thinking he was sarcastic

  53. peter b—

      right on

  54. peter b—

      right on

  55. Matthew Simmons—

      I think that might be just the ones that didn’t have titles. I got the same thing on Google Reader except for Gene’s post about the change.

  56. Matthew Simmons—

      I think that might be just the ones that didn’t have titles. I got the same thing on Google Reader except for Gene’s post about the change.

  57. tao—

      nice

      good job gene

  58. tao—

      nice

      good job gene

  59. audri—

      this is hot. magma hot. maybe add a disco ball and the metamorphosis is complete.

  60. audri—

      this is hot. magma hot. maybe add a disco ball and the metamorphosis is complete.

  61. Adam Robinson—

      No!

  62. audri—

      which also begs the question: are you giant vermin or are you dancer?

  63. Adam Robinson—

      No!

  64. audri—

      which also begs the question: are you giant vermin or are you dancer?

  65. Gene Morgan—

      Thanks, Tao.

  66. Gene Morgan—

      Thanks, Tao.

  67. Brad Green—

      Yep. Your post came through with a title. Thanks.

  68. Brad Green—

      Yep. Your post came through with a title. Thanks.

  69. chris—

      this site looks like the inside of a unicorns battered uterus

  70. chris—

      this site looks like the inside of a unicorns battered uterus

  71. Mark Doten—

      rad and super.

  72. Mark Doten—

      rad and super.

  73. Molly Gaudry—

      I wrote this in a different post, but I think the HTMLGIANT at the top looks higher on the right.

  74. Molly Gaudry—

      I wrote this in a different post, but I think the HTMLGIANT at the top looks higher on the right.

  75. Gene Morgan—

      It’s not. The logo is just aligned to the left.

  76. Gene Morgan—

      It’s not. The logo is just aligned to the left.

  77. PHM—

      Rocking out.

  78. PHM—

      Rocking out.

  79. Nathan (Nate) Tyree—

      Initially I hated it. The old design was so clean, simple, without pretense or pretension. This looked like a bad disco motif to me. But, as today has worn on, it has started to grow on me.

  80. Nathan (Nate) Tyree—

      Initially I hated it. The old design was so clean, simple, without pretense or pretension. This looked like a bad disco motif to me. But, as today has worn on, it has started to grow on me.

  81. Rob—

      Love the new design. Could you give a credit for that picture at the top of this post? It’s amazing.

  82. Rob—

      Love the new design. Could you give a credit for that picture at the top of this post? It’s amazing.

  83. Gene—
  84. Gene—
  85. Red—

      No. Everyone that’s worth liking likes you, Jimmy.

  86. Red—

      No. Everyone that’s worth liking likes you, Jimmy.

  87. Ken Baumann—

      Gene: The site looks great, and better than the old one, on the iPhone. And loads much faster.

  88. cobweb—

      yes… I was being sarcastic.

      but I really like your work jimmy.

      haven’t been coming to htmlg very long but felt like your were a popular subject and decided to humor(l)essly capitalize on the circumstance.

      too soon?

      anyways: keep it up! i read everything that you write!

  89. cobweb—

      yes… I was being sarcastic.

      but I really like your work jimmy.

      haven’t been coming to htmlg very long but felt like your were a popular subject and decided to humor(l)essly capitalize on the circumstance.

      too soon?

      anyways: keep it up! i read everything that you write!

  90. Gene Morgan—

      Sweet. Thanks, Ken. Now I just need to sell it in the Kindle store.

  91. Gene Morgan—

      Sweet. Thanks, Ken. Now I just need to sell it in the Kindle store.

  92. Ross Brighton—

      need tags in sidebar as before.

  93. Ross Brighton—

      need tags in sidebar as before.

  94. keith n b—

      hey gene, is there any reason you took the dates away from the posts? personally the dates were really helpful for when i wanted to go back and reread a post for whatever reason and couldn’t remember the details, but had a vague sense of its temporal context.

  95. keith n b—

      hey gene, is there any reason you took the dates away from the posts? personally the dates were really helpful for when i wanted to go back and reread a post for whatever reason and couldn’t remember the details, but had a vague sense of its temporal context.

  96. Gene Morgan—

      The individual pages have the exact date, and I didn’t really consider why someone would need it on the main page. You’re right though, I added the day of the week to the index pages to help you find recent stuff. Thanks for pointing that out.

  97. Gene Morgan—

      The individual pages have the exact date, and I didn’t really consider why someone would need it on the main page. You’re right though, I added the day of the week to the index pages to help you find recent stuff. Thanks for pointing that out.

  98. Gene Morgan—

      We didn’t want to overload the site with too many sidebar links.

      You can still find category links on the individual post pages, underneath the author name.

  99. Gene Morgan—

      We didn’t want to overload the site with too many sidebar links.

      You can still find category links on the individual post pages, underneath the author name.

  100. kerri—

      the new site feels like the way a full cooked veggie brekkie tastes. mmm, mmm, mmmmmmm

  101. kerri—

      the new site feels like the way a full cooked veggie brekkie tastes. mmm, mmm, mmmmmmm

  102. Cuauhtémoc Cortés Corrado—

      I think your wife should have had a baby.

  103. Cuauhtémoc Cortés Corrado—

      I think your wife should have had a baby.

  104. Cuauhtémoc Cortés Corrado—

      Preferably mine.

  105. Cuauhtémoc Cortés Corrado—

      Preferably mine.

  106. Gene Morgan—

      I’m so flattered you want to fuck my wife. That’s not creepy at all.

  107. Gene Morgan—

      I’m so flattered you want to fuck my wife. That’s not creepy at all.

  108. Rachel—

      In case you’re still taking feedback, here’s mine:

      The way my comments start with “Rachel—” looks like the rest is someone talking to me, not something coming from me.

  109. Rachel—

      In case you’re still taking feedback, here’s mine:

      The way my comments start with “Rachel—” looks like the rest is someone talking to me, not something coming from me.

  110. Gene Morgan—

      I considered putting “says” after every name, but it’s pretty redundant and useless. I’m pretty sure everyone realizes that it’s you speaking, no matter how I break that up. If I used a colon, it’d be just as arbitrary.

      Maybe “Rachel says,” with a comma would be more book-like. I’m not sure that gets the point across any better though.

  111. Gene Morgan—

      I considered putting “says” after every name, but it’s pretty redundant and useless. I’m pretty sure everyone realizes that it’s you speaking, no matter how I break that up. If I used a colon, it’d be just as arbitrary.

      Maybe “Rachel says,” with a comma would be more book-like. I’m not sure that gets the point across any better though.

  112. ayankus—

      gene, it looks fine. if they can’t figure it out they’ve pretty much just found out about the internet.

  113. ayankus—

      gene, it looks fine. if they can’t figure it out they’ve pretty much just found out about the internet.

  114. Gene Morgan—

      Thanks, ayankus. I feel like I did a good job.

      I don’t really mind explaining my design choices. If I can’t justify my reasoning to people in the comments, then it’s probably flawed. I get a lot out of the process.

  115. Gene Morgan—

      Thanks, ayankus. I feel like I did a good job.

      I don’t really mind explaining my design choices. If I can’t justify my reasoning to people in the comments, then it’s probably flawed. I get a lot out of the process.

  116. Andre—

      I don’t know if anyone has mentioned this yet, but I love the “Fail Unicorn” when your search doesn’t turn up any results. AWESOME

  117. Andre—

      I don’t know if anyone has mentioned this yet, but I love the “Fail Unicorn” when your search doesn’t turn up any results. AWESOME